Schellongowski Peter, Losert Heidrun, Locker Gottfried J, Laczika Klaus, Frass Michael, Holzinger Ulrike, Bojic Andja, Staudinger Thomas
Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Apr;33(4):625-31. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0513-y. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
To establish whether prolonged lateral steep position during continuous rotation therapy leads to improvement on pulmonary gas exchange, respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics.
Prospective observational study.
Intensive care unit of a university hospital.
Twelve consecutive patients suffering from acute lung injury or adult respiratory distress syndrome undergoing continuous rotation therapy.
Blood gas analysis, static lung compliance, blood pressure, cardiac index and pulmonary shunt fraction were measured in supine as well as in left and right lateral steep position at 62 degrees during continuous rotation therapy (phase I). Rotation was then stopped for 30 min with the patients in supine position, left and right lateral steep position, and the same measurements were performed every 10 min (phase II).
Phase I and II revealed no significant changes in PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio, mean arterial blood pressure, pulmonary shunt fraction, or cardiac index. Significantly lower static compliance was observed in lateral steep position than in supine position (p<0.001). Concomitantly, PaCO(2) was significantly lower in supine position than in left and right lateral steep position (p<0.01).
Lateral steep positioning impairs the compliance of the respiratory system. Prolonged lateral steep position does not lead to benefits with respect to oxygenation or hemodynamics. Individual response to the different positions is unpredictable. The pauses in "extreme" positions should be as short as possible.
确定持续旋转治疗期间长时间处于侧倾陡坡位是否能改善肺气体交换、呼吸力学和血流动力学。
前瞻性观察研究。
一所大学医院的重症监护病房。
12例连续接受持续旋转治疗的急性肺损伤或成人呼吸窘迫综合征患者。
在持续旋转治疗期间(第一阶段),于仰卧位以及左侧和右侧62度侧倾陡坡位测量血气分析、静态肺顺应性、血压、心脏指数和肺分流分数。然后停止旋转30分钟,患者分别处于仰卧位、左侧和右侧侧倾陡坡位,每10分钟进行相同测量(第二阶段)。
第一阶段和第二阶段显示,动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值、平均动脉血压、肺分流分数或心脏指数无显著变化。侧倾陡坡位的静态顺应性显著低于仰卧位(p<0.001)。同时,仰卧位的动脉血二氧化碳分压显著低于左侧和右侧侧倾陡坡位(p<0.01)。
侧倾陡坡位会损害呼吸系统的顺应性。长时间处于侧倾陡坡位在氧合或血流动力学方面并无益处。个体对不同体位的反应无法预测。在“极端”体位的停留时间应尽可能短。