Abdominal wall hernia repair: a comparison of sepramesh and parietex composite mesh in a rabbit hernia model.

BACKGROUND

This study compared Parietex composite mesh (PCM) with Sepramesh (SM) in terms of strength of tissue incorporation, adhesion formation, and mesh shrinkage, using an animal model.

STUDY DESIGN

A two-phase, prospective, randomized study using 44 New Zealand white rabbits. Each animal underwent creation of a standardized ventral hernia defect, followed by repair using either SM or PCM. Half of each group was sacrificed and examined at 1 month, and the remainder at 5 months. Outcomes measurements were strength of incorporation (SOI), type and area of adhesions (AA), and mesh shrinkage.

RESULTS

SOI for PCM was much greater than for SM, both at 1 month (60.8 N versus 42.6 N) and 5 months (70.9 N versus 31.5 N). The incidence of bowel adhesions was lower with PCM than SM, both at 1 month (1 versus 6) and at 5 months (0 versus 4). At 5 months, PCM demonstrated lower AA, both as a percentage of the mesh (5.6% versus 12.8%) and in terms of absolute area involved (321 mm(2) versus 840 mm(2)). PCM underwent considerably more shrinkage than SM, at both 1 month (38.2% versus 18.1%) and 5 months (17.4% versus 6.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

PCM demonstrated a substantially stronger SOI, which improved over time, and SOI of SM decreased. PCM was also superior in terms of adhesion prevention, but underwent considerably more shrinkage in this experimental model.