Jacob B P, Hogle N J, Durak E, Kim T, Fowler D L
Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1010 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):629-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9157-9. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
The optimal prosthesis for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair would combine excellent parietal surface tissue ingrowth with minimal visceral surface adhesiveness. Currently, few data are available from randomized trials comparing the commercially available prostheses.
In a pig model designed to incite adhesions, three 10 x 15-cm pieces of mesh (Proceed, Parietex Composite [PCO], and polypropylene [PPM]) were randomly positioned intraperitoneally in each of 10 animals using sutures and tack fixation. After a 28-day survival, the amount of shrinkage, the area and peel strength of visceral adhesions, the peak peel strength, the work required to separate mesh from the abdominal wall, and a coefficient representing the adhesiveness of tissue ingrowth were averaged for each type of mesh and then compared with the averages for the other prostheses. The histologic appearance of each prosthesis was documented.
Proceed had more shrinkage (99.6 cm2) than PCO (105.8 cm2) or PPM (112 cm2), although the difference was not statistically significant. The mean area of adhesions to PCO (11%) was significantly less than for Proceed (48%; p < 0.008) or PPM (46%; p < 0.008). Adhesion peel strength was significantly less for PCO (5.9 N) than for Proceed (12.1 N; p < 0.02) or PPM (12.9 N; p < 0.02). According to a filmy-to-dense scale of 1 to 5, adhesions were more filmy with PCO (1.7) than with PPM (2.9) or Proceed (3.7) (p < 0.007). Peak peel strength from the abdominal wall was significantly higher for PCO (17.2 N) than for Proceed (10.7 N) or PPM (10 N; p < 0.002). The histology of each prosthesis showed a neoperitoneum only with PCO.
With less shrinkage, fewer and less dense adhesions to the viscera, and significantly stronger abdominal wall adherence and tissue ingrowth at 28 days in this animal study, PCO was superior to both Proceed and PPM in all categories. Furthermore, PCO demonstrated all the favorable qualities needed in an optimal prosthesis for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, including the rapid development of a neoperitoneum.
用于腹腔镜腹疝修补的最佳假体应能使腹壁表面组织良好长入,同时使内脏表面粘连最少。目前,关于比较市售假体的随机试验数据较少。
在一个旨在引发粘连的猪模型中,使用缝线和钉合固定,将三块10×15厘米的补片(Proceed、Parietex复合补片[PCO]和聚丙烯补片[PPM])随机放置在10只动物的腹腔内。在28天存活期后,对每种补片的收缩量、内脏粘连的面积和剥离强度、峰值剥离强度、将补片与腹壁分离所需的功以及代表组织长入粘连性系数进行平均,然后与其他假体的平均值进行比较。记录每种假体的组织学外观。
Proceed的收缩量(99.6平方厘米)比PCO(105.8平方厘米)或PPM(112平方厘米)多,尽管差异无统计学意义。与PCO粘连的平均面积(11%)明显小于Proceed(48%;p<0.008)或PPM(46%;p<0.008)。PCO的粘连剥离强度(�.9牛)明显低于Proceed(12.1牛;p<0.02)或PPM(12.9牛;p<0.02)。根据1至5的薄膜状至致密程度分级,PCO的粘连(1.7)比PPM(2.9)或Proceed(3.7)更呈薄膜状(p<0.0)。PCO从腹壁的峰值剥离强度(17.2牛)明显高于Proceed(10.7牛)或PPM(10牛;p<0.002)。每种假体的组织学检查显示,只有PCO形成了新腹膜。
在本动物研究中,PCO在28天时收缩较少,与内脏的粘连较少且密度较低,腹壁粘连和组织长入明显更强,在所有类别中均优于Proceed和PPM。此外,PCO具备腹腔镜腹疝修补最佳假体所需的所有优良特性,包括新腹膜的快速形成。