Suppr超能文献

[各种血浆捐献方法的副作用和风险因素]

[Side effects and risk factors of various plasma donation methods].

作者信息

Ullrich H, Wiebecke D, Keller F

机构信息

Abt. für Transfusionsmedizin u. Immunhämatologie, Universitätskliniken Würzburg.

出版信息

Beitr Infusionsther. 1991;28:77-81.

PMID:1725664
Abstract

Weekly plasma donations of 600 ml were carried out for ten weeks on 20 probands to compare the Plasma Collecting System, Autopheresis C, Plamapur Monitor and the conventional double bag centrifugation. In terms of compatibility for the donor the different systems appear comparable. The PCS tubing set has to be emptied by isotonic saline at the end of the procedure. In the Autopheresis C and Plasmapur Monitor special care should be taken not to mix up isotonic saline and anticoagulant solutions. The protein concentration is higher in the centrifugation systems, but platelet contamination is higher, too.

摘要

对20名受试者每周进行600毫升的血浆捐献,持续十周,以比较血浆采集系统Autopheresis C、Plamapur Monitor和传统的双袋离心法。就对捐献者的适应性而言,不同系统表现相当。在操作结束时,PCS管路套件必须用等渗盐水排空。在Autopheresis C和Plasmapur Monitor系统中,应特别注意不要混淆等渗盐水和抗凝剂溶液。离心系统中的蛋白质浓度较高,但血小板污染也较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验