Suppr超能文献

血浆置换中4种程序的比较:止血潜力调节的研究

[Comparison of 4 procedures in plasmapheresis: studies of modifying the hemostasis potential].

作者信息

Wieding J U, Neumeyer H, Schulte B, Quentin S H

机构信息

Abtlg. f. Transfusionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Göttingen.

出版信息

Beitr Infusionsther. 1990;26:131-5.

PMID:1703812
Abstract

The separation of plasma using the systems "Plasmapur Monitor" (Fa. Organon), "Autopheresis-C" (Fa. Baxter) and "PCS" (Fa. Haemonetics) was compared with the conventional blood bag centrifugation. In 16 apheresis per method, several parameters with the main focus on blood coagulation were examined in addition to other criteria. Compared to conventional centrifugation of blood bags, the plasma separation machines led to an only slight activation of the coagulation system, which seems to be negligible for donors as well as recipients. Furthermore, a decrease of coagulation factors and inhibitors in the collected plasma was most pronounced using bag centrifugation. Beyond this, particularly in apheresis systems with plasma filtration the low number of remaining cells meets the aim to reach a high quality of transfused plasma.

摘要

将使用“Plasmapur Monitor”系统(欧加农公司)、“Autopheresis-C”系统(百特公司)和“PCS”系统(海莫奈蒂克斯公司)分离血浆的方法与传统血袋离心法进行了比较。每种方法进行了16次单采,除其他标准外,还检测了几个主要关注血液凝固的参数。与传统的血袋离心法相比,血浆分离机只会引起凝血系统的轻微激活,这对献血者和受血者来说似乎都可以忽略不计。此外,采用血袋离心法时,采集的血浆中凝血因子和抑制剂的减少最为明显。除此之外,特别是在具有血浆过滤功能的单采系统中,残留细胞数量少,达到了输注血浆高质量的目标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验