[Comparative analysis of various plasmapheresis methods--modern procedures of mechanical plasma collection compared with each other and with manual bag centrifugation procedures].

Four plasmapheresis procedures (manual blood bag centrifugation plasmapheresis, and the three plasmapheresis machines P.C.S./Haemonetics, Autopheresis-C/Baxter-Travenol, Plasmapur Monitor/Organon Teknika) were studied comparatively. The three machine procedures could be performed more easily and more rapidly and were well accepted by donors, autologous donors (patients) and staff. Compared with the traditional, well established manual procedure, a possible impairment of the plasma donors seems reduced rather than raised. Activation of the hemostatic system of the donors, measured with very sensitive methods, was found to be less pronounced when plasmapheresis was performed with the machines than when it was performed conventionally. The plasma product obtained by machine plasmapheresis was found to be of higher quality. All three systems showed less activation of the clotting system. Especially the plasma obtained by the P.C.S. showed a higher clotting factor yield. Plasma obtained by the Autopheresis-C and by the Plasmapur Monitor (both systems are equipped with filters) was markedly less contaminated with cells. The recently found low activation of the clotting system of plasma recipients, however, showed no differences when plasma obtained conventionally or by the Plasmapur Monitor was used. In summary, the new machine plasmapheresis devices offer a good alternative to the conventional blood bag centrifugation method and set new standards for the production of high quality plasma.