Motallebzadeh Reza, Bland J Martin, Markus Hugh S, Kaski Juan Carlos, Jahangiri Marjan
Department of Cardiac Surgery, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Feb;83(2):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.09.024.
Neurocognitive impairment can be a debilitating complication after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Cardiopulmonary bypass, in particular, cerebral emboli, has been implicated. We compared neurocognitive function and cerebral emboli in patients undergoing on-pump and off-pump CABG.
212 patients admitted for CABG were randomly assigned to on-pump (n = 104) or off-pump (n = 108) surgery. Embolic signals were detected with bilateral transcranial Doppler ultrasonography of the middle cerebral artery. Neurocognitive tests were administered preoperatively, on discharge from hospital, at 6 weeks, and at 6 months after surgery. Composite neurocognitive scores were derived using principal component analysis and were compared between the two groups, using analysis of covariance to adjust for baseline values.
At discharge from hospital, the adjusted composite neurocognitive score was 0.25 standard deviations greater in the off-pump group compared with the on-pump group (95% confidence interval: 0.05 to 0.45; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference at 6 weeks (0.09 standard deviations, 95% confidence interval: -0.11 to +0.30; p = 0.4) and 6 months (-0.002 standard deviations, 95% confidence interval: -0.23 to +0.23; p = 1.0). Median number of embolic signals was 1,605 (751 to 2,473) during on-pump and 9 (4 to 27) in off-pump CABG (p < 0.001). Age, length of education, and on-pump status were independent predictors of the predischarge neurocognitive score (p = 0.02, 0.03, and 0.006, respectively).
Cerebral emboli are more prevalent during on-pump CABG. At discharge from hospital, neurocognitive function is better after off-pump surgery, possibly as a result of the lower embolic load. However, the difference in neurocognitive function does not persist at 6 weeks and 6 months.
神经认知功能障碍可能是冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后一种使人衰弱的并发症。尤其体外循环,特别是脑栓塞,被认为与之有关。我们比较了接受体外循环和非体外循环CABG患者的神经认知功能和脑栓塞情况。
212例因CABG入院的患者被随机分配接受体外循环(n = 104)或非体外循环(n = 108)手术。通过双侧大脑中动脉经颅多普勒超声检测栓塞信号。术前、出院时、术后6周和6个月进行神经认知测试。使用主成分分析得出综合神经认知评分,并在两组之间进行比较,使用协方差分析来调整基线值。
出院时,非体外循环组调整后的综合神经认知评分比体外循环组高0.25个标准差(95%置信区间:0.05至0.45;p = 0.01)。6周时无显著差异(0.09个标准差,95%置信区间:-0.11至+0.30;p = 0.4),6个月时也无显著差异(-0.002个标准差,95%置信区间:-0.23至+0.23;p = 1.0)。体外循环CABG期间栓塞信号的中位数为1605(751至2473),非体外循环CABG为9(4至27)(p < 0.001)。年龄、受教育年限和体外循环状态是出院前神经认知评分的独立预测因素(分别为p = 0.02、 p = 0.03和p = 0.006)。
体外循环CABG期间脑栓塞更普遍。出院时,非体外循环手术后神经认知功能更好,可能是由于栓塞负荷较低。然而,神经认知功能的差异在6周和6个月时不再持续。