• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联邦政府支持对新技术进行快速研究的举措。

Federal initiatives to support rapid learning about new technologies.

作者信息

Tunis Sean R, Carino Tanisha V, Williams Reginald D, Bach Peter B

机构信息

Center for Medical Technology Policy, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):w140-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.w140. Epub 2007 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.w140
PMID:17259196
Abstract

Health policy and financing reforms place increasing emphasis on the ability of doctors and patients to make informed, cost-conscious care decisions. The federal government is supporting new initiatives in Medicare to increase the supply of reliable information on the benefits and risks of health care technologies. Medicare also is working with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of prescription drugs and other items or services. The value of these efforts will depend on coordination among individuals and institutions in the public and private sectors; clarity about focus, purpose, and priorities; and adequate and reliable long-term funding.

摘要

卫生政策与融资改革越来越强调医生和患者做出明智的、注重成本的医疗决策的能力。联邦政府正在支持医疗保险领域的新举措,以增加有关医疗技术益处和风险的可靠信息供应。医疗保险还在与医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)合作,评估处方药及其他项目或服务的比较效果。这些努力的成效将取决于公共和私营部门的个人与机构之间的协调;重点、目的和优先事项的明确性;以及充足且可靠的长期资金。

相似文献

1
Federal initiatives to support rapid learning about new technologies.联邦政府支持对新技术进行快速研究的举措。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):w140-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.w140. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
2
Ryan White CARE Act Title IV programs: a preliminary characterization of benefits and costs.《瑞安·怀特艾滋病紧急救援计划》第四章项目:效益与成本的初步描述
AIDS Public Policy J. 2005 Fall-Winter;20(3-4):108-25.
3
The medical expenditure panel survey: a national information resource to support healthcare cost research and inform policy and practice.医疗支出小组调查:一项支持医疗保健成本研究并为政策与实践提供信息的国家信息资源。
Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7 Suppl 1):S44-50. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a23e3a.
4
Struggling to invent high-reliability organizations in health care settings: Insights from the field.在医疗环境中努力创建高可靠性组织:来自该领域的见解。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1618-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00568.x.
5
Request for planning ideas. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, HHS. Notice.医疗保健政策与研究机构(美国卫生与公众服务部)规划思路征集通知
Fed Regist. 1999 Apr 15;64(72):18619-22.
6
Databases for outcomes research: what has 10 years of experience taught us?结果研究数据库:十年经验给了我们什么启示?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Aug-Sep;10(5):445-55. doi: 10.1002/pds.597.
7
Financing the health care of the aged.为老年人的医疗保健提供资金。
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1983 Jul(468):149-64.
8
Health resource allocation. A made-in-Canada description.卫生资源分配。加拿大本土描述。
J Leg Med. 2011 Jan;32(1):11-26. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2011.550823.
9
Medicare's future: cancer care.医疗保险的未来:癌症护理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):148-59. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.148.
10
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Intended versus inferred management after PET for cancer restaging: analysis of Medicare claims linked to a coverage with evidence development registry.癌症分期后 PET 检查的意向性与推断性治疗:与有证据开发登记处的保险范围相关的医疗保险索赔分析。
Med Care. 2013 Apr;51(4):361-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318287d860.
2
An evidence integration triangle for aligning science with policy and practice.证据整合三角模型,用于使科学、政策和实践保持一致。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):646-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.016.
3
Medicare's policy on carotid stents limited use to hospitals meeting quality guidelines yet did not hurt disadvantaged.
医疗保险政策规定颈动脉支架的使用仅限于符合质量标准的医院,但这并没有对弱势群体造成伤害。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Feb;30(2):312-21. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0320.
4
Medicare's Coverage With Evidence Development: A Policy-Making Tool in Evolution.医疗保险的循证发展覆盖范围:一种不断演进的政策制定工具。
J Oncol Pract. 2007 Nov;3(6):296-301. doi: 10.1200/JOP.0763501.
5
Access with evidence development schemes: a framework for description and evaluation.有证据开发计划的获取:一种描述和评价的框架。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(2):143-52. doi: 10.2165/11530850-000000000-00000.
6
Life-science research within US academic medical centers.美国学术医疗中心内的生命科学研究。
JAMA. 2009 Sep 2;302(9):969-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1265.
7
Who is responsible for evaluating the safety and effectiveness of medical devices? The role of independent technology assessment.谁负责评估医疗设备的安全性和有效性?独立技术评估的作用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0275-4.