McBride Doreen, Brüggenjürgen Bernd, Roll Stephanie, Willich Stefan N
Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Centre, 10098, Berlin, Germany.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2007 Aug;24(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s11239-006-0002-8. Epub 2007 Jan 27.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart arrhythmia, affecting 6% of people over 65 years, and carries a 4.5% average annual stroke risk, which can be reduced by appropriate anticoagulation. A multi-centre observational study, Management and Outcomes in the Care of Atrial fibrillation in Germany (MOCA) was conducted to evaluate the current anticoagulation treatment pattern in patients with AF in Germany.
Patients with AF were recruited from December 2003 to June 2004 in physician practices. Clinical data including International Normalised Ratio (INR) values and anticoagulation strategy were obtained from the physician chart and the patient follow-up, documenting hospitalisations, medications, and complications, was conducted at three and six months. Main outcome measures included anticoagulation methods, practice guidelines adherence and time within recommended anticoagulation range.
361 patients with AF (mean age 71+/-9, 61% male) were recruited in 45 physician practices. 90% of all patients had been treated with Vitamin K-Antagonists (VKA) at some time since AF-diagnosis, 88% were still treated. 10% of patients received aspirin as their anticoagulation therapy. Monitoring occurred at least once a month in over 70% of patients. Monitored INR values were 56% of the time within, 14% below and 30% over the recommended target range. A gap of 40% existed between the guideline recommendations and actual practice. Younger patients (<60 years of age) with no documented risk factors for stroke were over-treated with VKAs and patients older than 75 years without contraindications for anticoagulation were under-treated.
This study presents 'real-life' data in treating patients with AF in Germany and identifies the potential to advance the quality of care with respect to anticoagulation.
心房颤动(AF)是最常见的心律失常,在65岁以上人群中的发病率为6%,平均每年有4.5%的中风风险,适当的抗凝治疗可降低该风险。一项多中心观察性研究——德国心房颤动护理中的管理与结局(MOCA)研究,旨在评估德国心房颤动患者当前的抗凝治疗模式。
2003年12月至2004年6月期间,从医生诊所招募心房颤动患者。临床数据包括国际标准化比值(INR)值和抗凝策略,这些数据来自医生病历,且在3个月和6个月时对患者进行随访,记录住院情况、用药情况及并发症。主要结局指标包括抗凝方法、对实践指南的遵循情况以及处于推荐抗凝范围内的时间。
在45个医生诊所招募了361例心房颤动患者(平均年龄71±9岁,61%为男性)。自房颤诊断以来,所有患者中有90%曾在某个时间接受过维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)治疗,88%仍在接受治疗。10%的患者接受阿司匹林作为抗凝治疗。超过70%的患者每月至少监测一次。监测的INR值有56%的时间处于、14%低于、30%高于推荐目标范围。指南建议与实际实践之间存在40%的差距。无中风危险因素记录的年轻患者(<60岁)VKA治疗过度,而75岁以上无抗凝治疗禁忌证的患者治疗不足。
本研究展示了德国治疗心房颤动患者的“真实生活”数据,并确定了在抗凝治疗方面提高护理质量的潜力。