Wright T C, Richart R M, Ferenczy A, Koulos J
Division of Obstetrical and Gynecological Pathology, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York.
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jan;79(1):147-53.
A comparison is made of the histologic changes in the cervical epithelium and stroma following CO2 laser conization and office excisional biopsy of cervical tissue using the loop electrosurgical excision procedure. In both types of specimens, two zones of thermal injury were detected. The zone at the margin of resection measured approximately 50 microns in thickness and was characterized by extensive carbonization and charring. The other zone was much more variable in thickness and characterized by tissue coagulation, but lacked charring. No significant difference in the biocharacteristics or extent of thermal damage was detected between the methods. For 11 specimens obtained with the CO2 laser, the coagulated zone ranged from 130-750 microns in greatest thickness; the mean thickness was 411 microns. For 40 specimens obtained using the loop procedure, the range of thickness of the coagulated zone was 150-830 microns, and the mean thickness was 396 microns. The difference in the mean value of thermal injury (measured in microns) between the laser and loop procedures was not significant (Student t test; P = .79). Extensive areas of carbonization and epithelial distortion at the margins of excision were only occasionally present in specimens obtained by the electrosurgical excision procedure but almost invariably present in CO2 laser specimens. However, in all cases it was possible to evaluate the epithelium and the stroma both histologically and cytologically.
对采用二氧化碳激光锥切术和使用环形电外科切除程序进行宫颈组织门诊切除活检后宫颈上皮和基质的组织学变化进行了比较。在这两种标本中,均检测到两个热损伤区域。切除边缘处的区域厚度约为50微米,其特征为广泛的碳化和烧焦。另一个区域厚度变化较大,其特征为组织凝固,但无烧焦现象。两种方法之间未检测到生物特性或热损伤程度的显著差异。对于用二氧化碳激光获取的11个标本,凝固区最大厚度范围为130 - 750微米;平均厚度为411微米。对于使用环形程序获取的40个标本,凝固区厚度范围为150 - 830微米,平均厚度为396微米。激光和环形程序之间热损伤平均值(以微米为单位)的差异不显著(学生t检验;P = 0.79)。切除边缘处广泛的碳化区域和上皮扭曲仅偶尔出现在电外科切除程序获取的标本中,但几乎总是出现在二氧化碳激光标本中。然而,在所有病例中,均可从组织学和细胞学角度对上皮和基质进行评估。