Suppr超能文献

不同双能X线吸收仪(DXA)设备中脊柱和髋部骨密度测量的标准化

Standardization of spine and hip BMD measurements in different DXA devices.

作者信息

Ozdemir Aysegul, Uçar Murat

机构信息

Gazi University, Department of Radiology, Besevler, Ankara 06510, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2007 Jun;62(3):423-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.11.034. Epub 2007 Feb 7.

Abstract

AIM

To compare BMD values of lumbar and hip regions measured in two different DXA scanners in one laboratory, and to investigate the efficiencies of implemented and specifically derived standardization formulas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PA lumbar (L2-L4) and right femoral neck BMD values were obtained in 100 women (aged 26-75), consecutively in GE-Lunar DPX-NT and Hologic QDR 4500 C DXA scanners. Standardization of BMD values obtained in two different DXA devices was done according to the method developed by International DXA Standardization Committee (IDSC), using the European Spine Phantom (ESP) to obtain the specific constant value. Mean corrected standardized BMD (sBMD) values in two scanners have been compared with each other and with the mean reported sBMD values, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean lumbar BMD values were 0.950+/-0.117 g/cm(2) for Hologic and 1.068+/-0.135 g/cm(2) for GE-Lunar (p<0.05); mean corrected sBMD values were 1.035+/-0.128 g/cm(2) for Hologic and 1.035+/-0.131 g/cm(2) for GE-Lunar (p>0.05). The mean femoral neck BMD values were 0.798+/-0.114 g/cm(2) for Hologic and 0.895+/-0.111 g/cm(2) for GE-Lunar (p<0.05); mean corrected sBMD values were 0.869+/-0.124 g/cm(2) for Hologic and 0.867+/-0.108 g/cm(2) for GE-Lunar (p>0.05). The difference between the mean values of BMD and sBMD, both corrected and reported, were statistically important in each scanner (p<0.05). The mean values of corrected and reported sBMD were also statistically different in each scanner (p<0.05; mean standard error in the spine was 1.3 for GE-Lunar and 1.8 for the Hologic device).

CONCLUSION

The originally proposed standardization formulae may not optimally correct for manufacturer, model and device-specific differences. Therefore, use of sBMD is not recommended to compare results of individual patients obtained on scanners of different type and brand. The residual error of reported sBMD, however, is substantially smaller than for manufacturer-specific results, and therefore, reporting standardized results is useful for population studies.

摘要

目的

比较在同一实验室中用两种不同双能X线吸收仪(DXA)测量的腰椎和髋部区域的骨密度(BMD)值,并研究已实施的和专门推导的标准化公式的有效性。

材料与方法

对100名年龄在26至75岁的女性,依次在GE-Lunar DPX-NT和Hologic QDR 4500 C DXA扫描仪上测量腰椎前后位(L2-L4)和右侧股骨颈的BMD值。根据国际DXA标准化委员会(IDSC)制定的方法,使用欧洲脊柱体模(ESP)获得特定常数,对在两种不同DXA设备上获得的BMD值进行标准化。将两台扫描仪中平均校正后的标准化BMD(sBMD)值相互比较,并分别与报告的平均sBMD值进行比较。

结果

Hologic扫描仪的平均腰椎BMD值为0.950±0.117g/cm²,GE-Lunar扫描仪为1.068±0.135g/cm²(p<0.05);Hologic扫描仪平均校正后的sBMD值为1.035±0.128g/cm²,GE-Lunar扫描仪为1.035±0.131g/cm²(p>0.05)。Hologic扫描仪的平均股骨颈BMD值为0.798±0.114g/cm²,GE-Lunar扫描仪为0.895±0.111g/cm²(p<0.05);Hologic扫描仪平均校正后的sBMD值为0.869±0.124g/cm²,GE-Lunar扫描仪为0.867±0.108g/cm²(p>0.05)。在每台扫描仪中,校正后的和报告的BMD及sBMD平均值之间的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在每台扫描仪中,校正后的和报告的sBMD平均值也具有统计学差异(p<0.05;GE-Lunar扫描仪在脊柱部位的平均标准误差为1.3,Hologic设备为1.8)。

结论

最初提出的标准化公式可能无法对不同制造商、型号和设备的差异进行最佳校正。因此,不建议使用sBMD来比较在不同类型和品牌扫描仪上获得的个体患者结果。然而,报告的sBMD的残余误差明显小于特定制造商的结果,因此,报告标准化结果对人群研究是有用的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验