Lu Y, Fuerst T, Hui S, Genant H K
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0628, USA.
Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(6):438-44. doi: 10.1007/s001980170087.
The International Committee for Standards in Bone Measurement (ICSBM) has published standardization formulas for total hip bone mineral density (BMD). In many applications, however, BMD of hip subregions, such as femoral neck (FN), trochanter (TR), and Ward's triangle (WT), are commonly measured. This paper addresses whether the standardization formulas for total hip BMD can be adequately used for hip subregions. We used data from 100 healthy women, from 20 to 80 years old, who had hip BMD measured in both the total hip and hip subregions by a Hologic QDR 2000, a Lunar DPX, and a Norland XR26 Mark II. The same women were used by ICSBM for the standardization of total hip BMD. In addition, we used data of 3139 patients from a clinical trial to validate our results. We derived standardization formulas for FN, TR, and WT using the same statistical method as that used for total hip BMD. We applied both total hip calibration formulas and subregion-specific formulas to the data and compared the corresponding effect. We found that the total hip calibration formulas can partially reduce BMD differences between the Hologic and Lunar as well as the Lunar and Norland scanners in hip subregions, but increase differences between the Hologic and Norland scanners. The subregion calibration formulas are most appropriate for calibrating subregion BMD values and their absolute changes, and should be adopted. Standardization is unnecessary for BMD percentage changes in our clinical trial data.
国际骨测量标准委员会(ICSBM)已发布了全髋关节骨密度(BMD)的标准化公式。然而,在许多应用中,通常会测量髋关节亚区域的骨密度,如股骨颈(FN)、大转子(TR)和沃德三角(WT)。本文探讨全髋关节骨密度的标准化公式是否可充分用于髋关节亚区域。我们使用了100名年龄在20至80岁之间的健康女性的数据,她们通过Hologic QDR 2000、Lunar DPX和Norland XR26 Mark II测量了全髋关节和髋关节亚区域的骨密度。ICSBM在全髋关节骨密度标准化中使用的也是这些女性的数据。此外,我们使用了来自一项临床试验的3139名患者的数据来验证我们的结果。我们使用与全髋关节骨密度相同的统计方法得出了股骨颈、大转子和沃德三角的标准化公式。我们将全髋关节校准公式和亚区域特定公式都应用于这些数据,并比较了相应的效果。我们发现,全髋关节校准公式可以部分减少Hologic与Lunar以及Lunar与Norland扫描仪在髋关节亚区域的骨密度差异,但会增加Hologic与Norland扫描仪之间的差异。亚区域校准公式最适合校准亚区域骨密度值及其绝对变化,应予以采用。在我们的临床试验数据中,骨密度百分比变化无需进行标准化。