• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

LapSim的结构效度:LapSim虚拟现实模拟器能否区分新手和专家?

Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?

作者信息

van Dongen K W, Tournoij E, van der Zee D C, Schijven M P, Broeders I A M J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2007 Aug;21(8):1413-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9188-2. Epub 2007 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-006-9188-2
PMID:17294307
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Virtual reality simulators may be invaluable in training and assessing future endoscopic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the results of a training session reflect the actual skill of the trainee who is being assessed and thereby establish construct validity for the LapSim virtual reality simulator (Surgical Science Ltd., Gothenburg, Sweden).

METHODS

Forty-eight subjects were assigned to one of three groups: 16 novices (0 endoscopic procedures), 16 surgical residents in training (>10 but <100 endoscopic procedures), and 16 experienced endoscopic surgeons (>100 endoscopic procedures). Performance was measured by a relative scoring system that combines single parameters measured by the computer.

RESULTS

The higher the level of endoscopic experience of a participant, the higher the score. Experienced surgeons and surgical residents in training showed statistically significant higher scores than novices for both overall score and efficiency, speed, and precision parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that performance of the various tasks on the simulator corresponds to the respective level of endoscopic experience in our research population. This study demonstrates construct validity for the LapSim virtual reality simulator. It thus measures relevant skills and can be integrated in an endoscopic training and assessment program.

摘要

背景

虚拟现实模拟器在培训和评估未来的内镜外科医生方面可能具有极高的价值。本研究的目的是调查培训课程的结果是否反映了被评估学员的实际技能,从而确定LapSim虚拟现实模拟器(瑞典哥德堡外科科学有限公司)的结构效度。

方法

48名受试者被分为三组之一:16名新手(0次内镜手术)、16名正在接受培训的外科住院医师(内镜手术超过10次但少于100次)和16名经验丰富的内镜外科医生(内镜手术超过100次)。通过一个相对评分系统来衡量表现,该系统结合了计算机测量的单个参数。

结果

参与者的内镜经验水平越高,得分越高。经验丰富的外科医生和正在接受培训的外科住院医师在总体得分以及效率、速度和精准度参数方面的得分在统计学上显著高于新手。

结论

我们的结果表明,模拟器上各项任务的表现与我们研究人群中各自的内镜经验水平相对应。本研究证明了LapSim虚拟现实模拟器的结构效度。因此,它能够测量相关技能,并可纳入内镜培训和评估计划中。

相似文献

1
Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?LapSim的结构效度:LapSim虚拟现实模拟器能否区分新手和专家?
Surg Endosc. 2007 Aug;21(8):1413-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9188-2. Epub 2007 Feb 9.
2
Objective evaluation of minimally invasive surgical skills for transplantation. Surgeons using a virtual reality simulator.移植微创手术技能的客观评估。使用虚拟现实模拟器的外科医生。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2009 Mar-Apr;104(2):181-5.
3
The LapSim: a learning environment for both experts and novices.LapSim:一个面向专家和新手的学习环境。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;111:414-7.
4
Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.一种用于基础内镜技能培训的新型基础虚拟现实模拟器SIMENDO的验证
Surg Endosc. 2006 Mar;20(3):511-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0230-6. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
5
[A virtual reality simulator for objective assessment of surgeons' laparoscopic skill].一种用于客观评估外科医生腹腔镜手术技能的虚拟现实模拟器
Chirurg. 2005 Feb;76(2):151-6. doi: 10.1007/s00104-004-0936-3.
6
Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.增强现实与虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟:有何区别?ProMIS增强现实腹腔镜模拟器与LapSim虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟器的比较。
World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):764-72. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y.
7
Does training novices to criteria and does rapid acquisition of skills on laparoscopic simulators have predictive validity or are we just playing video games?训练新手达到标准以及在腹腔镜模拟器上快速掌握技能是否具有预测效度,还是说我们只是在玩电子游戏?
J Surg Educ. 2008 Nov-Dec;65(6):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.05.008.
8
Training and assessment using the LapSim laparoscopic simulator: a scoping review of validity evidence.使用LapSim腹腔镜模拟器进行培训与评估:有效性证据的范围综述
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1658-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09593-0. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
9
Surgical skills assessment of applicants to general surgery residency.外科住院医师申请人的外科技能评估。
J Surg Res. 2011 Oct;170(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 4.
10
Skills assessment using a virtual reality simulator, LapSim, after training to develop fundamental skills for endoscopic surgery.使用虚拟现实模拟器LapSim进行技能评估,该评估在训练以培养内镜手术基本技能之后开展。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19(1):24-9. doi: 10.3109/13645700903492993.

引用本文的文献

1
A narrative review of Neonatal Echocardiography Simulator Training (NEST): role of simulators in acquiring neonatal echocardiography skills effectively.新生儿超声心动图模拟器训练(NEST)的叙述性综述:模拟器在有效掌握新生儿超声心动图技能中的作用。
Pediatr Res. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04321-5.
2
Research trends in virtual reality surgical simulation for education: a systematic review.虚拟现实手术模拟用于教育的研究趋势:一项系统综述
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2025 Jun 15;28(2):51-61. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2025.28.2.51.
3
Validity of task-specific metrics for assessment in perineal proctectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.虚拟现实手术模拟器验证的共识指南。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Dec;19(12):1523-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0384-2. Epub 2005 Oct 26.
2
Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills using a virtual reality stimulator.使用虚拟现实模拟器对腹腔镜技能进行客观评估。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1216-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2154-y. Epub 2005 Jul 28.
3
The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course--improving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first E.A.E.S. accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum.
经肛直肠切除术中特定任务指标评估的有效性。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5319-5330. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11029-w. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
4
Development and validation of an objective virtual reality tool for assessing technical aptitude among potential candidates for surgical training.开发并验证一种客观的虚拟现实工具,用于评估有手术培训潜力的潜在候选人的技术能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 14;24(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05228-1.
5
Objective metrics for hand-sewn bowel anastomoses can differentiate novice from expert surgeons.手工肠吻合的客观指标可以区分新手和专家外科医生。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1282-1292. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09584-1. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
6
Training and assessment using the LapSim laparoscopic simulator: a scoping review of validity evidence.使用LapSim腹腔镜模拟器进行培训与评估:有效性证据的范围综述
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1658-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09593-0. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
7
Validation of a novel virtual reality simulation system with the focus on training for surgical dissection during laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy.验证一种新型虚拟现实模拟系统,重点是针对腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术的手术解剖训练。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jan 8;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01441-7.
8
Coffee break has no impact on laparoscopic skills: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled parallel-group trial.咖啡休息对腹腔镜技能没有影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组试验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3533-3541. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08675-9. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
9
Construct Validity of a Serious Game for Laparoscopic Skills Training: Validation Study.用于腹腔镜技能训练的严肃游戏的结构效度:验证研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2020 May 7;8(2):e17222. doi: 10.2196/17222.
10
Augmented reality in medical education: a systematic review.医学教育中的增强现实:一项系统综述。
Can Med Educ J. 2020 Mar 16;11(1):e81-e96. doi: 10.36834/cmej.61705. eCollection 2020 Mar.
埃因霍温腹腔镜胆囊切除术培训课程——使用虚拟现实培训提高手术室表现:首个欧洲内镜外科学会认可的虚拟现实培训课程的结果
Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1220-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2240-1.
4
Assessing the learning curve for the acquisition of laparoscopic skills on a virtual reality simulator.评估在虚拟现实模拟器上掌握腹腔镜技能的学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2005 May;19(5):678-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8943-5. Epub 2005 Mar 23.
5
Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator.LAPSIM腹腔镜手术模拟器的结构效度。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Mar;19(3):401-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8202-9. Epub 2004 Dec 23.
6
Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.结构效度:专家和新手在Xitact LS500腹腔镜模拟器上的操作表现。
Surg Endosc. 2003 May;17(5):803-10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9151-9. Epub 2003 Feb 17.
7
Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality.使用虚拟现实对经验丰富、初级和新手腹腔镜手术医生进行客观心理运动技能评估。
World J Surg. 2001 Nov;25(11):1478-83. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0133-1.
8
Science, medicine, and the future. Virtual reality in surgery.科学、医学与未来。手术中的虚拟现实
BMJ. 2001 Oct 20;323(7318):912-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7318.912.
9
Laparoscopic or conventional Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: randomised clinical trial. The Netherlands Antireflux Surgery Study Group.腹腔镜或传统尼氏胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病:随机临床试验。荷兰抗反流手术研究组。
Lancet. 2000 Jan 15;355(9199):170-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)03097-4.
10
Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator.虚拟现实用于教授和评估腹腔镜手术中精神运动技能的验证:使用MIST VR腹腔镜模拟器的随机对照研究结果
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998;50:124-30.