Continuous full-time occlusion of the sound eye vs full-time occlusion of the sound eye periodically alternating with occlusion of the amblyopic eye in treatment of amblyopia: a prospective randomized study.

PURPOSE

To compare continuous full-time (24 hours per day) occlusion of the sound eye with full-time occlusion (24 hours per day) of the sound eye 1 day more than the years of age periodically alternating with occlusion of the amblyopic eye for 1 day, as treatments for profound strabismic amblyopia in children older than 5 years.

METHODS

A total of 53 patients with visual acuity (VA) of 0.4 and less in the amblyopic eye (tested by crowded Landolt Cs) after previously being provided optimal optical correction were randomly assigned to receive either of the two patching regimens. VA and pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (PVEP) were recorded prospectively at 1-month intervals. Improvement in VA and the reduction in crowding difficulties (CD) were the main outcome measures of the treatment efficiency.

RESULTS

Both treatment modalities were equally effective. Of the 51 subjects who completed the study, 21 (41.2%) were cured whereas 32 (62.7%) attained satisfactory improvement. Recovery of VA was related to age, with cure being obtained in 23.5% (4/17) and satisfactory improvement in 52.9% (9/17) of patients older than 9 years. Larger gain in VA influenced the stability of the vision over time.

CONCLUSIONS

It can be concluded that in clinically monitored parameters both treatment modalities were equally effective without any statistical or clinical significance in the observed groups of patients. However, events like the ""trade-off"" effect, occurrence of occlusion amblyopia, or prolongation of PVEP latency of the sound eye indicate that full-time continuous occlusion possibly presents a more effective form of treatment.