Kajbafzadeh Abdolmohammad, Salmasi Amirali Hassanzadeh, Payabvash Seyedmehdi, Arshadi Hamid, Akbari Hamid Reza, Moosavi Shahram
Department of Urology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1118-23; discussion 1123. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.001.
We report the evolution of endoscopic treatment of ectopic ureteroceles from the unroofing technique to a novel approach using concomitant ureterocele double puncture and intraureterocele fulguration. We also compare the results of different endoscopic modalities at a single center.
We reviewed the records of 46 children with ectopic ureteroceles who were treated endoscopically between 1995 and 2005. The patients were divided into 2 main groups. Group 1 included 17 patients who underwent common endoscopic treatments, including ureterocele incision (4 patients), single ureterocele puncture (4), and single puncture with insertion of a Double-J stent (9). Group 2 included 29 children who underwent ureterocele double puncture and fulguration of the anterior and posterior walls of the collapsed ureterocele after insertion of a Double-J stent into both punctured sites. We also managed concomitant vesicoureteral reflux by endoscopic injection of tricalcium phosphate ceramic into the subureteral region.
Total success rates in group 1 were 0%, 25% and 33% in patients who underwent ureterocele incision, single ureterocele puncture and single puncture with insertion of a stent, respectively. Total success rate in group 2 was 90% (p<0.05). New onset vesicoureteral reflux developed in 8 patients (47%) in group 1, of which 6 were in ureterocele moieties, and in 8 patients (28%) in group 2, with none in a ureterocele moiety (p<0.01). A total of 13 patients (76%) in group 1 required open surgical intervention, compared to 3 (10%) in group 2 (p<0.05).
This new endoscopic approach is highly effective in the treatment of children with ectopic ureteroceles.
我们报告了异位输尿管囊肿内镜治疗从囊肿开窗术到一种使用输尿管囊肿双穿刺及囊肿内电灼的新方法的演变过程。我们还在单一中心比较了不同内镜治疗方式的结果。
我们回顾了1995年至2005年间接受内镜治疗的46例异位输尿管囊肿患儿的记录。患者被分为两个主要组。第1组包括17例接受常规内镜治疗的患者,包括输尿管囊肿切开术(4例)、单输尿管囊肿穿刺(4例)以及单穿刺并置入双J支架(9例)。第2组包括29例儿童,他们在两个穿刺部位均置入双J支架后,进行输尿管囊肿双穿刺及塌陷输尿管囊肿前后壁的电灼。我们还通过内镜将磷酸三钙陶瓷注射到输尿管下段区域来处理合并的膀胱输尿管反流。
第1组中,接受输尿管囊肿切开术、单输尿管囊肿穿刺和单穿刺并置入支架的患者的总成功率分别为0%、25%和33%。第2组的总成功率为90%(p<0.05)。第1组中有8例患者(47%)出现新发膀胱输尿管反流,其中6例在输尿管囊肿部分,第2组中有8例患者(28%)出现反流,且输尿管囊肿部分无反流发生(p<0.01)。第1组共有13例患者(76%)需要开放手术干预,而第2组为3例(10%)(p<0.05)。
这种新的内镜方法在治疗异位输尿管囊肿患儿方面非常有效。