Wang Angela Yee-Moon
University Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Perit Dial Int. 2007 Mar-Apr;27(2):116-24.
The CANUSA study originally reported the importance of total small-solute clearance in predicting survival of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. However, subsequent reanalysis of data from the CANUSA study clearly demonstrated that the predictive power for mortality in PD patients was largely attributable to residual renal function (RRF) and not to the dose of PD. While this should not lead to the assumption that the dose of PD is unimportant, it does clearly indicate that the contribution of residual renal clearance and PD clearance to the overall survival of PD cannot be considered equivalent. In a previous study, we also demonstrated the importance of loss of RRF in predicting a heightened risk of mortality and cardiovascular death in PD patients. In this review, we focus our discussion on the different potential mechanisms that explain the important link between RRF and cardiovascular disease and survival of PD patients. We provide evidence to explain why RRF is so important to patients receiving long-term PD treatment and why it should be regarded as the "heart" of PD.
CANUSA研究最初报告了总小分子溶质清除率在预测腹膜透析(PD)患者生存率方面的重要性。然而,随后对CANUSA研究数据的重新分析清楚地表明,PD患者死亡率的预测能力很大程度上归因于残余肾功能(RRF),而非PD剂量。虽然这不应该导致认为PD剂量不重要的假设,但它确实清楚地表明,残余肾清除率和PD清除率对PD患者总体生存的贡献不能被视为等同。在先前的一项研究中,我们还证明了RRF丧失在预测PD患者死亡风险和心血管死亡风险增加方面的重要性。在本综述中,我们将讨论重点放在解释RRF与心血管疾病及PD患者生存之间重要联系的不同潜在机制上。我们提供证据来解释为什么RRF对接受长期PD治疗的患者如此重要,以及为什么它应被视为PD的“核心”。