Dansey R D, Jacka P J, Strachan S A, Hay M
Ernest Oppenheimer Hospital, Welkom, Orange Free State, South Africa.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jan;15(1):81-4. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90060-7.
Cefotaxime 1 g intramuscularly (i.m.) 12-hourly was compared with ceftriaxone 1 g i.m. 12-hourly in adult patients requiring hospitalization with uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia. Fifty-two patients were enrolled and two were subsequently withdrawn, leaving 50 patients who completed the study; 23 received cefotaxime and 27 received ceftriaxone. Clinical cure was achieved in 49 of the 50 patients (98%). One treatment failure occurred in a patient who received ceftriaxone. The only significant pathogen isolated from the pretreatment sputum cultures was Streptococcus pneumoniae (50%). All isolates were sensitive to both drugs. Cefotaxime 1 g i.m. 12-hourly was as effective as ceftriaxone in the treatment of patients with uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospital admission.
对因非复杂性社区获得性肺炎而需住院治疗的成年患者,比较了每12小时肌内注射1克头孢噻肟与每12小时肌内注射1克头孢曲松的疗效。共纳入52例患者,随后有2例退出,剩余50例患者完成了研究;其中23例接受头孢噻肟治疗,27例接受头孢曲松治疗。50例患者中有49例(98%)实现了临床治愈。1例接受头孢曲松治疗的患者出现治疗失败。从治疗前痰培养中分离出的唯一重要病原体是肺炎链球菌(50%)。所有分离菌株对两种药物均敏感。每12小时肌内注射1克头孢噻肟在治疗需住院的非复杂性社区获得性肺炎患者方面与头孢曲松同样有效。