Krijn Merel, Emmelkamp Paul M G, Olafsson Ragnar P, Bouwman Manon, van Gerwen Lucas J, Spinhoven Philip, Schuemie Martijn J, van der Mast Charles A P G
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 Feb;78(2):121-8.
Fear of flying (FOF) can be a serious problem for individuals who develop this condition and for military and civilian organizations that operate aircraft. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three treatments: bibliotherapy (BIB) without therapist contact; individualized virtual reality exposure therapy (VRE); and cognitive behavior therapy (CB). In addition, we evaluated the effect of following up VRE and CB with 2 d of group cognitive-behavioral training (GrCB).
There were 86 subjects suffering from FOF who entered the study; 19 BIB, 29 VRE, and 16 CB subjects completed the treatment protocols. The BIB subjects were then treated with VRE (n = 7) or CB (n = 12). There were 59 subjects who were then trained with GrCB.
Treatment with VRE or CB was more effective than BIB. Both VRE and CB showed a decline in FOF on the two main outcome measures. There was no statistically significant difference between those two therapies. However, effect sizes were lower for VRE (small to moderate) than for CB (moderate) and the addition of GrCB had less effect for VRE than for CB.
VRE holds promise as treatment for FOF, but in this trial CB followed by GrCB showed the largest decrease in subjective anxiety. The results suggest that future research should focus on comparing the effectiveness of VRE vs. VRE plus cognitive techniques or measure the effectiveness of each component of treatment. Moreover, the effectiveness of the GrCB as stand-alone treatment should be investigated, which might even be superior in cost-effectiveness.
对于患有飞行恐惧症(FOF)的个人以及运营飞机的军事和民用组织而言,飞行恐惧症可能是一个严重问题。本研究的目的是比较三种治疗方法的效果:无治疗师接触的自助疗法(BIB);个性化虚拟现实暴露疗法(VRE);以及认知行为疗法(CB)。此外,我们评估了在VRE和CB之后进行为期2天的团体认知行为训练(GrCB)的效果。
86名患有飞行恐惧症的受试者进入本研究;19名接受BIB治疗、29名接受VRE治疗和16名接受CB治疗的受试者完成了治疗方案。随后,接受BIB治疗的受试者接受了VRE治疗(n = 7)或CB治疗(n = 12)。然后,有59名受试者接受了GrCB训练。
VRE或CB治疗比BIB更有效。VRE和CB在两项主要结局指标上均显示飞行恐惧症有所下降。这两种疗法之间没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,VRE的效应量(小到中等)低于CB(中等),并且GrCB对VRE的效果比对CB的效果小。
VRE有望成为治疗飞行恐惧症的方法,但在本试验中,CB后接GrCB显示主观焦虑下降幅度最大。结果表明,未来的研究应侧重于比较VRE与VRE加认知技术的有效性,或测量治疗各组成部分的有效性。此外,应研究GrCB作为独立治疗方法的有效性,其在成本效益方面甚至可能更优。