Cohen S, Amar D, Pantuck C B, Pantuck E J, Weissman A M, Landa S, Singer N
Department of Anesthesiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx.
Anesth Analg. 1992 Feb;74(2):226-30. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199202000-00009.
We compared the analgesia, side effects, and plasma concentrations of buprenorphine and fentanyl in a double-blind study of 78 parturients receiving one of these drugs by patient-controlled epidural infusion after elective cesarean section with epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomized to three epidural infusion groups: group 1 (n = 26), 3 micrograms/mL buprenorphine with 0.015% bupivacaine and 1 microgram/mL epinephrine; group 2 (n = 26), 3 micrograms/mL fentanyl with 0.015% bupivacaine and 1 microgram/mL epinephrine; and group 3 (n = 26), 3 micrograms/mL fentanyl with 0.015% bupivacaine. Plasma for determination of opioid concentrations was obtained in some subjects in each group at intervals up to 48 h during the infusion and in some subjects from each group at intervals after the infusion was stopped. Pain relief was similar and satisfactory in all three groups. The median overall satisfaction scores were high for all three groups. Pruritus was more common in the fentanyl groups (P less than 0.05). However, vomiting was more disturbing to the patients and seen only with buprenorphine. No patient had a respiratory rate less than 12 breaths/min. Epinephrine use was associated with a slower infusion rate (P less than 0.05, group 2 vs 3). All patients were able to ambulate without difficulty. Mean opioid plasma concentrations did not exceed 1.5 ng/mL. Thus, epidural patient-controlled analgesia in all three groups provided excellent analgesia, permitted ambulation, and was without serious side effects. Epidural buprenorphine offered no advantages over epidural fentanyl.
在一项双盲研究中,我们比较了布托啡诺和芬太尼的镇痛效果、副作用及血浆浓度。该研究纳入了78例择期剖宫产且采用硬膜外麻醉的产妇,她们通过患者自控硬膜外输注接受这两种药物中的一种。患者被随机分为三个硬膜外输注组:第1组(n = 26),3微克/毫升布托啡诺加0.015%布比卡因和1微克/毫升肾上腺素;第2组(n = 26),3微克/毫升芬太尼加0.015%布比卡因和1微克/毫升肾上腺素;第3组(n = 26),3微克/毫升芬太尼加0.015%布比卡因。在输注期间,每隔一定时间从每组的部分受试者中采集用于测定阿片类药物浓度的血浆,直至48小时,在输注停止后,也从每组的部分受试者中每隔一定时间采集血浆。三组的疼痛缓解情况相似且令人满意。三组的总体满意度中位数评分都很高。瘙痒在芬太尼组中更常见(P < 0.05)。然而,呕吐对患者的困扰更大,且仅在布托啡诺组中出现。没有患者的呼吸频率低于12次/分钟。使用肾上腺素与输注速度较慢有关(P < 0.05,第2组与第3组相比)。所有患者都能轻松行走。阿片类药物的平均血浆浓度未超过1.5纳克/毫升。因此,三组的硬膜外患者自控镇痛均提供了良好的镇痛效果,允许患者行走,且无严重副作用。硬膜外使用布托啡诺并不比硬膜外使用芬太尼有优势。