Suppr超能文献

连续硬膜外输注布比卡因联合连续硬膜外输注或患者自控硬膜外注射芬太尼用于术后镇痛的比较。

Comparison of continuous epidural bupivacaine infusion plus either continuous epidural infusion or patient-controlled epidural injection of fentanyl for postoperative analgesia.

作者信息

Boudreault D, Brasseur L, Samii K, Lemoing J P

机构信息

Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Université Paris-Sud, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Kremlin Bicêtre, France.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1991 Aug;73(2):132-7. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199108000-00005.

Abstract

We compared the postoperative epidural analgesia provided by the continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine supplemented with patient-controlled injection (PCA) of epidural fentanyl with that provided by a continuous infusion of bupivacaine supplemented with a continuous epidural infusion of fentanyl. Our patient population comprised 16 ASA physical status I or II patients undergoing laparotomy with a midline incision under general anesthesia combined with bupivacaine epidural analgesia. Post-operatively, a continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine (0.1 mg.kg-1.h-1) was combined with epidural fentanyl given by either (a) PCA (15-micrograms bolus with a lockout interval of 12 min, n = 8) or (b) continuous infusion (1 microgram.kg-1.h-1, n = 8). In the case of inadequate pain relief in the latter group, the fentanyl infusion rate was increased by 10 micrograms/h. Analgesia evaluated by a visual analogue pain score and by a verbal pain score was similarly effective in both groups. The sedation score was also similar in both groups. The total dose of epidural fentanyl administered during the first 24 h was significantly lower in the PCA group than in the continuous infusion group (405 +/- 110 micrograms vs 1600 +/- 245 micrograms, P less than 0.001). The dose of fentanyl given during each 4-h interval ranged between 40 and 160 micrograms in the PCA group and 251 and 292 micrograms in the continuous infusion group. Clinically detectable respiratory depression was not observed in either group. In conclusion, epidural administration of 0.1 mg.kg-1.h-1 bupivacaine combined with fentanyl provides effective postoperative analgesia with a total dose of fentanyl required that is lower when fentanyl is administered by epidural PCA rather than by continuous epidural infusion.

摘要

我们比较了连续硬膜外输注布比卡因并辅以患者自控硬膜外注射芬太尼所提供的术后硬膜外镇痛效果与连续输注布比卡因并辅以连续硬膜外输注芬太尼所提供的术后硬膜外镇痛效果。我们的患者群体包括16例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I或II级的患者,这些患者在全身麻醉联合布比卡因硬膜外镇痛下接受中线切口剖腹手术。术后,连续硬膜外输注布比卡因(0.1mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹)与以下两种方式给予的硬膜外芬太尼联合使用:(a)患者自控给药(15微克推注剂量,锁定间隔为12分钟,n = 8)或(b)连续输注(1微克·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹,n = 8)。在后一组中,如果疼痛缓解不足,则将芬太尼输注速率提高10微克/小时。通过视觉模拟疼痛评分和言语疼痛评分评估的镇痛效果在两组中相似。两组的镇静评分也相似。PCA组在前24小时内给予的硬膜外芬太尼总剂量明显低于连续输注组(405±110微克 vs 1600±245微克,P<0.001)。PCA组每4小时间隔给予的芬太尼剂量在40至160微克之间,连续输注组在251至292微克之间。两组均未观察到临床可检测到的呼吸抑制。总之,硬膜外给予0.1mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹布比卡因联合芬太尼可提供有效的术后镇痛,当通过硬膜外PCA而非连续硬膜外输注给予芬太尼时,所需的芬太尼总剂量更低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验