Zhong Kate X, Tariot P N, Mintzer J, Minkwitz M C, Devine N A
1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19850-5437, USA.
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2007 Feb;4(1):81-93. doi: 10.2174/156720507779939805.
In this 10-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, elderly institutionalized patients with dementia and agitation were randomized (3:3:2) to quetiapine 200mg/day, 100mg/day, or placebo. The primary endpoint was change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-Excitement Component (EC) scores at endpoint, analysed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) and observed cases (OC) approaches. Other efficacy measures were the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), and response rates (percentage with > or =40% reduction [PANSS-EC]; "much" or "very much improved" [CGI-C]), Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version (NPI-NH), and Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). The key safety measure was incidence of adverse events; change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was also assessed. Baseline characteristics of 333 participants (quetiapine 200mg/day, n=117; quetiapine 100mg/day, n=124; placebo, n=92) and completion rates (63-65%) were comparable among groups. Compared with placebo, quetiapine 200mg/day was associated with clinically greater improvements in PANSS-EC (LOCF, p=0.065; OC, p=0.014 [ANCOVA]), CGI-C (LOCF, p=0.017; OC, p=0.002 [ANOVA]), and CGI-C response rates (LOCF, p=0.002; OC, p<0.001 [Chi-square test]). Quetiapine 100mg/day did not differentiate from placebo on these measures. There were no between-group differences in NPI-NH or CMAI. Incidences of cerebrovascular adverse events, postural hypotension, and falls were similar among groups. MMSE did not change in any group. Mortality was numerically higher in the quetiapine groups; rates were not statistically different from placebo. The results of this study suggest that quetiapine 200mg/day was effective and well-tolerated for treating agitation associated with dementia. However, caution should be exercised given the concerns regarding increased mortality with atypical antipsychotics in this vulnerable patient population.
在这项为期10周的双盲、固定剂量研究中,患有痴呆和激越症状的老年住院患者被随机分组(3:3:2),分别接受每日200毫克喹硫平、每日100毫克喹硫平或安慰剂治疗。主要终点是终点时阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)-激越分量表(EC)得分的变化,采用末次观察结转(LOCF)和观察病例(OC)方法进行分析。其他疗效指标包括临床总体印象变化量表(CGI-C)、缓解率(PANSS-EC降低≥40%的百分比;CGI-C评定为“明显改善”或“非常明显改善”)、神经精神科问卷-养老院版(NPI-NH)以及科恩-曼斯菲尔德激越量表(CMAI)。关键安全指标是不良事件的发生率;同时也评估简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)的变化。333名参与者(每日200毫克喹硫平组,n = 117;每日100毫克喹硫平组,n = 124;安慰剂组,n = 92)的基线特征及各组完成率(63 - 65%)具有可比性。与安慰剂相比,每日200毫克喹硫平在PANSS-EC(LOCF,p = 0.065;OC,p = 0.014 [协方差分析])、CGI-C(LOCF,p = 0.017;OC,p = 0.002 [方差分析])以及CGI-C缓解率(LOCF,p = 0.002;OC,p < 0.001 [卡方检验])方面有更大的临床改善。每日100毫克喹硫平在这些指标上与安慰剂无差异。NPI-NH或CMAI在组间无差异。脑血管不良事件、体位性低血压和跌倒的发生率在各组间相似。任何组的MMSE均未改变。喹硫平组的死亡率在数值上更高;但与安慰剂组相比,差异无统计学意义。本研究结果表明,每日200毫克喹硫平治疗与痴呆相关的激越有效且耐受性良好。然而,鉴于该脆弱患者群体中使用非典型抗精神病药物会增加死亡率,应谨慎使用。