• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者主动脉瓣置换术的成本效益:一项初步研究。

Cost-effectiveness of aortic valve replacement in the elderly: an introductory study.

作者信息

Wu YingXing, Jin Ruyun, Gao Guangqiang, Grunkemeier Gary L, Starr Albert

机构信息

Providence Heart and Vascular Institute, Providence Health System, Portland, Ore 97225, USA.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):608-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.044.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.044
PMID:17320552
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

With increased life expectancy and improved technology, valve replacement is being offered to increasing numbers of elderly patients with satisfactory clinical results. By using standard econometric techniques, we estimated the relative cost-effectiveness of aortic valve replacement by drawing on a large prospective database at our institution. By using aortic valve replacement as an example, this introductory report paves the way to more definitive studies of these issues in the future.

METHODS

From 1961 to 2003, 4617 adult patients underwent aortic valve replacement at our service. These patients were provided with a prospective lifetime follow-up. As of 2005, these patients had accumulated 31,671 patient-years of follow-up (maximum 41 years) and had returned 22,396 yearly questionnaires. A statistical model was used to estimate the future life years of patients who are currently alive. In the absence of direct estimates of utility, quality-adjusted life years were estimated from New York Heart Association class. The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated by the patient's age at surgery.

RESULTS

The overall cost-effectiveness ratio was approximately 13,528 dollars per quality-adjusted life year gained. The cost-effectiveness ratio increased according to age at surgery, up to 19,826 dollars per quality-adjusted life year for octogenarians and 27,182 dollars per quality-adjusted life year for nonagenarians.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the limited scope of this introductory study, aortic valve replacement is cost-effective for all age groups and is very cost-effective for all but the most elderly according to standard econometric rules of thumb.

摘要

目的

随着预期寿命的延长和技术的进步,越来越多的老年患者接受了瓣膜置换术,临床效果令人满意。通过使用标准的计量经济学技术,我们利用本机构的一个大型前瞻性数据库估算了主动脉瓣置换术的相对成本效益。以主动脉瓣置换术为例,本 introductory report 为未来对这些问题进行更确定性的研究铺平了道路。

方法

1961年至2003年,4617例成年患者在我们科室接受了主动脉瓣置换术。这些患者接受了前瞻性的终身随访。截至2005年,这些患者累计随访了31671患者年(最长41年),并返回了22396份年度问卷。使用统计模型估算目前存活患者的未来生命年数。在缺乏直接效用估计的情况下,根据纽约心脏协会分级估算质量调整生命年数。成本效益比按患者手术时的年龄计算。

结果

总体成本效益比约为每获得一个质量调整生命年13528美元。成本效益比根据手术时的年龄增加,八旬老人每质量调整生命年高达19826美元,九旬老人每质量调整生命年高达27182美元。

结论

鉴于本 introductory study 的范围有限,根据标准的计量经济学经验法则,主动脉瓣置换术对所有年龄组都具有成本效益,除了最年长的患者外,对所有患者都非常具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of aortic valve replacement in the elderly: an introductory study.老年患者主动脉瓣置换术的成本效益:一项初步研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):608-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.044.
2
The value of aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: an economic analysis.老年患者主动脉瓣置换术的价值:一项经济学分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):603-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.08.042.
3
The stentless freestyle bioprosthesis: impact of age over 80 years on quality of life, perioperative, and mid-term outcome.无支架自由式生物假体:80岁以上患者年龄对生活质量、围手术期及中期结果的影响。
J Card Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;21(4):379-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2006.00249.x.
4
Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.圣犹达医疗Silzone机械瓣膜假体的七年随访结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 May;137(5):1109-15.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.07.070.
5
Long-term survival after the Bentall procedure in 206 patients with bicuspid aortic valve.206例二叶式主动脉瓣患者行Bentall手术后的长期生存情况。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Oct;84(4):1186-93; discussion 1193-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.057.
6
[The best of valvular heart disease in 2006].[2006年心脏瓣膜病研究精粹]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2007 Jan;100 Spec No 1:19-28.
7
Predicted patient outcome after aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Stentless Freestyle bioprostheses.使用美敦力无支架自由式生物瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换术后的预测患者预后。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2007 Jul;16(4):423-8; discussion 429.
8
Redo valvular surgery in elderly patients.老年患者再次进行瓣膜手术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Feb;87(2):521-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.09.030.
9
Aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair compared with combined aortic and mitral valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术联合二尖瓣修复术与主动脉瓣和二尖瓣联合置换术的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Oct;84(4):1219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.115.
10
Multiple valve surgery with beating heart technique.心脏不停跳技术下的多瓣膜手术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Feb;87(2):527-31. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.10.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic Benefits of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement on Patients With Symptomatic Aortic Valve Regurgitation.主动脉瓣反流症状患者外科主动脉瓣置换术的经济效益。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e9983. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035278. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
Effect of an E-Prescription Intervention on the Adherence to Surgical Chemoprophylaxis Duration in Cardiac Surgery: A Single Centre Experience.电子处方干预对心脏手术中外科预防性化疗持续时间依从性的影响:单中心经验
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jul 13;12(7):1182. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12071182.
3
A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of heart valve replacement with a mechanical versus biological prosthesis in patients with heart valvular disease.
心脏瓣膜疾病患者采用机械瓣膜与生物瓣膜置换的成本效益的系统评价。
Heart Fail Rev. 2020 May;25(3):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09897-9.
4
ANMCO/SIC/SICI-GISE/SICCH Executive Summary of Consensus Document on Risk Stratification in elderly patients with aortic stenosis before surgery or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.意大利心脏病学国家协会/意大利心血管介入学会/意大利老年心脏病学和心脏外科协会执行摘要:关于老年主动脉瓣狭窄患者手术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术前风险分层的共识文件
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2017 May;19(Suppl D):D354-D369. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/sux012. Epub 2017 May 2.
5
Systematic review of model-based economic evaluations of heart valve implantations.心脏瓣膜植入物的基于模型的经济评价的系统评价。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Mar;19(2):241-255. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0880-z. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
The direct health-care burden of valvular heart disease: evidence from US national survey data.心脏瓣膜病的直接医疗负担:来自美国全国调查数据的证据。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Oct 18;8:613-627. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S112691. eCollection 2016.
7
Perspective on the cost-effectiveness of transapical aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients: Outcomes of a decision-analytic model.经导管主动脉瓣植入术在高危患者中的成本效益透视:决策分析模型的结果。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jul;1(2):145-55. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2012.06.12.
8
Quality of life among patients with severe aortic stenosis.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的生活质量。
Neth Heart J. 2013 Jan;21(1):21-7. doi: 10.1007/s12471-012-0364-9.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of TAVR.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的成本效益分析
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2012 Apr-Jun;8(2):26-8. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-8-2-26.