Monticelli Francesca, Sadek Fernanda T, Schuster George S, Volkmann Keith R, Looney Stephen W, Ferrari Marco, Toledano Manuel, Pashley David H, Tay Franklin R
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Dental Materials, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
J Endod. 2007 Mar;33(3):310-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.012.
This in vitro study evaluated the sealing efficacy of three root-filling systems/techniques in preventing bacterial leakage. Instrumented single-rooted root segments were filled with (1) warm vertical compaction with gutta-percha/AH Plus; (2) single-cone technique with ActiV GP; and (3) single-cone technique with Gutta-Flow. A dual-chamber leakage model using S. mutans as a microbial marker was used for leakage evaluation. Bacterial penetration was monitored over a 100-day period. Leakage was recorded when turbidity was observed in the lower chamber. Gutta-percha warm vertical compaction exhibited the best seal with bacterial leakage observed in only 16.7% of the specimens between 59 and 100 days. All ActiV GP specimens leaked between 7 and 100 days; 50% of the Gutta-Flow specimens leaked between 22 and 100 days. The two contemporary single-cone techniques did not insure a durable apical seal against bacterial leakage. A warm vertical compaction technique using thermoplasticized gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer appears to be more effective in minimizing bacterial leakage.
这项体外研究评估了三种根管充填系统/技术在防止细菌渗漏方面的封闭效果。将预备好的单根牙根片段分别用以下方法进行充填:(1)热牙胶垂直加压联合AH Plus糊剂;(2)使用ActiV GP的单锥技术;(3)使用Gutta-Flow的单锥技术。采用以变形链球菌作为微生物标记物的双腔渗漏模型来评估渗漏情况。在100天的时间内监测细菌的侵入情况。当下腔出现浑浊时记录渗漏情况。热牙胶垂直加压封闭效果最佳,仅16.7%的标本在59至100天之间出现细菌渗漏。所有使用ActiV GP的标本在7至100天之间均发生渗漏;50%使用Gutta-Flow的标本在22至100天之间发生渗漏。两种当代的单锥技术不能确保对细菌渗漏形成持久的根尖封闭。使用热塑牙胶和AH Plus封闭剂的热牙胶垂直加压技术在使细菌渗漏最小化方面似乎更有效。