van Strien Tatjana, Herman C Peter, Engels Rutger C M E, Larsen Junilla K, van Leeuwe Jan F J
Institute for Gender Studies and Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Appetite. 2007 Jul;49(1):109-21. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.01.003. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
The Restraint Scale (RS) is a widely used measure to assess restrained eating. The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity of the RS in a sample of normal-weight (n=349) and overweight (n=409) females using confirmatory factor analyses of the RS in relation to other measures for dieting, overeating and body dissatisfaction. Following Laessle et al. [(1989a). A comparison of the validity of three scales for the assessment of dietary restraint. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 504-507], we assumed a three-factor structure: (1) overeating and disinhibitory eating, (2) dieting and restriction of food intake, and (3) body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness. Analyses revealed that the RS loaded significantly on all three factors for both samples, confirming its multifactorial structure. However, the RS appears to capture these constructs differently in overweight and normal-weight females such that the RS may overestimate restraint in overweight individuals. This may explain the greater effectiveness of the RS in predicting counter-regulation in normal-weight than in overweight samples of dieters.
克制量表(RS)是一种广泛用于评估克制性饮食的测量工具。本研究的目的是通过对RS与节食、暴饮暴食和身体不满等其他测量指标进行验证性因素分析,来检验RS在正常体重(n = 349)和超重(n = 409)女性样本中的结构效度。按照莱斯勒等人[(1989a)。三种评估饮食克制量表效度的比较。《变态心理学杂志》,98,504 - 507]的方法,我们假设了一个三因素结构:(1)暴饮暴食和去抑制性饮食,(2)节食和食物摄入量限制,以及(3)身体不满和对瘦的追求。分析表明,RS在两个样本的所有三个因素上都有显著载荷,证实了其多因素结构。然而,RS在超重和正常体重女性中对这些结构的捕捉方式似乎有所不同,以至于RS可能高估了超重个体的克制程度。这可能解释了RS在预测正常体重节食者的反调节方面比超重节食者样本更有效的原因。