Isenring Elisabeth A, Bauer Judith D, Capra Sandra
Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Auistralia.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Mar;107(3):404-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.12.007.
A randomized controlled trial previously conducted in radiation oncology patients demonstrated that nutrition intervention had a beneficial impact on body weight, nutritional status, and quality of life compared with standard practice, but it did not report on dietary intake data.
To determine the impact of nutrition intervention compared with standard practice on dietary intake in outpatients receiving radiotherapy.
Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Sixty consecutive radiation oncology outpatients (51 men and nine women; age 61.9+/-14 years [mean+/-standard deviation]).
Australian private radiotherapy facility.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either nutrition intervention (n=29) (nutrition counseling following the American Dietetic Association [ADA] medical nutrition therapy [MNT] protocol for radiation oncology) or standard practice (n=31) (general nutrition talk and booklet).
Dietary intake (protein, energy, fiber) assessed at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting radiotherapy.
Repeated-measures analysis of variance done on an intention to treat basis.
The nutrition intervention group had a higher mean total energy (P=0.029) and protein intake (P<0.001) compared with the standard practice group. Mean intake per kilogram of body weight for the nutrition intervention group ranged from 28 to 31 kcal/kg/day compared with 25 to 29 kcal/kg/day for the standard practice group (P=0.022). The nutrition intervention group had a higher mean protein intake (1.1 to 1.3 g/kg/day) compared with the standard practice group (1.0 to 1.1 g/kg/day) (P=0.001). Although the change in fiber intake between the groups was not significant, there was a trend in the anticipated direction (P=0.083).
Intensive nutrition intervention following the ADA MNT protocol results in improved dietary intake compared with standard practice and seems to beneficially impact nutrition-related outcomes previously observed in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy. The ADA MNT protocol for radiation oncology is a useful guide to the level of nutrition support required.
先前在放射肿瘤学患者中进行的一项随机对照试验表明,与标准治疗相比,营养干预对体重、营养状况和生活质量有有益影响,但未报告饮食摄入数据。
确定与标准治疗相比,营养干预对接受放疗的门诊患者饮食摄入的影响。
前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
60例连续的放射肿瘤学门诊患者(51名男性和9名女性;年龄61.9±14岁[均值±标准差])。
澳大利亚私立放疗机构。
患者被随机分配接受营养干预(n = 29)(按照美国饮食协会[ADA]放射肿瘤学医学营养治疗[MNT]方案进行营养咨询)或标准治疗(n = 31)(一般性营养讲座和手册)。
在放疗开始时的基线以及放疗开始后4周、8周和12周评估饮食摄入(蛋白质、能量、纤维)。
基于意向性分析进行重复测量方差分析。
与标准治疗组相比,营养干预组的平均总能量(P = 0.029)和蛋白质摄入量(P < 0.001)更高。营养干预组每千克体重的平均摄入量为28至31千卡/千克/天,而标准治疗组为25至29千卡/千克/天(P = 0.022)。与标准治疗组(1.0至1.1克/千克/天)相比,营养干预组的平均蛋白质摄入量更高(1.1至1.3克/千克/天)(P = 0.001)。尽管两组之间纤维摄入量的变化不显著,但有朝着预期方向的趋势(P = 0.083)。
与标准治疗相比,按照ADA MNT方案进行强化营养干预可改善饮食摄入,并且似乎对先前在接受放疗的肿瘤门诊患者中观察到的营养相关结局有有益影响。ADA放射肿瘤学MNT方案是所需营养支持水平的有用指南。