• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Validity and reliability of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction for home care].

作者信息

Masiero Maria Paola, Salmaso Daniele, Frison Tiziana, Guzzinati Stefano, Andrigo Margherita, Marin Irene

机构信息

Infermiera, UO Lungodegenza Geriatria, Ulss 12 Veneziana, P.O. Mestre.

出版信息

Assist Inferm Ric. 2006 Oct-Dec;25(4):220-6.

PMID:17328482
Abstract

AIM

Specific instruments to measure patients satisfaction for home care are missing in Italy. A questionnaire was devised, based on two well known and validated instruments (La Monica-Oberst Patient Satisfaction Scale (LOPSS) and the The Patient Satisfaction With Health Care Provider Scale (PSHCPS) and validated.

METHODS

The questionnaire was discussed with nurses and psychologists. The questionnarie was initially administered to a sample of 25 patients home care patients, not cognitively impaired, and to their caregivers. The concordance was measured with the K di Cohen, Sperman tau of Cograduation and tau of Kendall coefficiencies, with very satisfactory results (K = 0.68, p = 0.72, tau = 0.61). After 30 days the questionnaire was administered to the same patients and relatives, to test stability/reliability and internal coherence. Finally, it was administered to a stratified sample of 139 patients (or to their relatives) to assess validity with factorial analysis, and again internal coherence.

RESULTS

The final questionnaire has 20 closed ended and three open questions. Concordance between patients and relatives on closed questions was good, therefore the questionnaires can be administered to patients or relatives. The test retest showed also a good stability (K 0.83). The factorial analysis identified two sub scales: one that measures patients satisfaction for the organization and for the interpersonal relationship between patients and nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

The questionnaire has good psychometric properties and can be reliably administered also to caregivers. Some questions with higher number of missing answers could be improved.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Validity and reliability of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction for home care].
Assist Inferm Ric. 2006 Oct-Dec;25(4):220-6.
2
[Validity and reliability of a new questionnaire on patient satisfaction in rehabilitative therapy].[一份关于康复治疗中患者满意度的新问卷的效度和信度]
Minerva Med. 1998 Mar;89(3):57-64.
3
Home Healthcare Nurses' Job Satisfaction Scale: refinement and psychometric testing.家庭医疗护理人员工作满意度量表:修订与心理测量测试
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Oct;52(1):70-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03556.x.
4
[Patient satisfaction in the ambulatory setting: validation of a scale and identification of associated factors].[门诊环境中的患者满意度:量表的验证及相关因素的识别]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1996 May 18;126(20):864-71.
5
The FAMCARE-Patient scale: measuring satisfaction with care of outpatients with advanced cancer.FAMCARE-患者量表:测量晚期癌症门诊患者对护理的满意度。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Dec;45(18):3182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
6
Satisfaction of patients hospitalised in psychiatric hospitals: a randomised comparison of two psychiatric-specific and one generic satisfaction questionnaires.精神病院住院患者的满意度:两种精神病专科医院专用及一种通用满意度调查问卷的随机比较
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug 28;6:108. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-108.
7
Open-ended questions in surveys of patients' satisfaction with family doctors.关于患者对家庭医生满意度调查中的开放式问题。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Apr;12(2):86-9. doi: 10.1258/135581907780279639.
8
Development and validation of the Overactive Bladder Satisfaction (OAB-S) Questionnaire.膀胱过度活动症满意度(OAB-S)问卷的编制与验证
Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(3):179-90. doi: 10.1002/nau.20455.
9
Development of the Italian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-I): A cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study.意大利版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI-I)的开发:一项跨文化适应、信效度研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2090-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa1e6b.
10
Measuring individualized nursing care: assessment of reliability and validity of three scales.衡量个性化护理:三种量表的信效度评估
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jul;59(1):77-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04282.x. Epub 2007 May 29.