Booth Jane E, Carlson Caryn L, Tucker David M
Department of Psychology, University of Texas-Austin, United States.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 May;22(4):423-32. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.017. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
The performance of 16 attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)/C, 26 ADHD/IA, and 24 control children was compared using a computer reaction time task designed to measure the effects of Posner's orienting, conflict and alerting attentional systems. No group differences in orienting or conflict were found. In contrast, children with ADHD/IA showed stronger alerting effects than those with ADHD/C, as indicated by relatively greater performance benefits following a warning cue. Although neither ADHD group differed significantly from controls on alerting, effect size comparisons indicated that children with ADHD/IA showed a somewhat larger (d=.57) and children with ADHD/C a somewhat smaller (d=.44) alerting effect relative to control children. The results are among the first to document unique patterns of attentional capacity for ADHD subtypes.
使用一项计算机反应时任务,比较了16名注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)/C型、26名ADHD/IA型儿童和24名对照儿童的表现,该任务旨在测量波斯纳定向、冲突和警觉注意系统的影响。未发现各小组在定向或冲突方面存在差异。相比之下,ADHD/IA型儿童比ADHD/C型儿童表现出更强的警觉效应,如在警告提示后表现出相对更大的表现优势所示。虽然两个ADHD组在警觉方面与对照组均无显著差异,但效应量比较表明,相对于对照儿童,ADHD/IA型儿童的警觉效应略大(d = 0.57),ADHD/C型儿童的警觉效应略小(d = 0.44)。这些结果是最早记录ADHD亚型独特注意力能力模式的研究之一。