Suppr超能文献

一项关于皮质类固醇治疗急性视神经炎的随机对照试验。视神经炎研究组。

A randomized, controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute optic neuritis. The Optic Neuritis Study Group.

作者信息

Beck R W, Cleary P A, Anderson M M, Keltner J L, Shults W T, Kaufman D I, Buckley E G, Corbett J J, Kupersmith M J, Miller N R

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa 33612.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 27;326(9):581-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202273260901.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

The use of corticosteroids to treat optic neuritis is controversial. At 15 clinical centers, we randomly assigned 457 patients with acute optic neuritis to receive oral prednisone (1 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) for 14 days; intravenous methylprednisolone (1 g per day) for 3 days, followed by oral prednisone (1 mg per kilogram per day) for 11 days; or oral placebo for 14 days. Visual function was assessed over a six-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Visual function recovered faster in the group receiving intravenous methylprednisolone than in the placebo group; this was particularly true for the reversal of visual-field defects (P = 0.0001). Although the differences between the groups decreased with time, at six months the group that received intravenous methylprednisolone still had slightly better visual fields (P = 0.054), contrast sensitivity (P = 0.026), and color vision (P = 0.033) but not better visual acuity (P = 0.66). The outcome in the oral-prednisone group did not differ from that in the placebo group. In addition, the rate of new episodes of optic neuritis in either eye was higher in the group receiving oral prednisone, but not the group receiving intravenous methylprednisolone, than in the placebo group (relative risk for oral prednisone vs. placebo, 1.79; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 2.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone speeds the recovery of visual loss due to optic neuritis and results in slightly better vision at six months. Oral prednisone alone, as prescribed in this study, is an ineffective treatment and increases the risk of new episodes of optic neuritis.

摘要

背景与方法

使用皮质类固醇治疗视神经炎存在争议。在15个临床中心,我们将457例急性视神经炎患者随机分为三组,分别接受口服泼尼松(每日每千克体重1毫克),疗程14天;静脉注射甲泼尼龙(每日1克),疗程3天,随后口服泼尼松(每日每千克体重1毫克),疗程11天;或口服安慰剂,疗程14天。在为期6个月的随访期内对视功能进行评估。

结果

接受静脉注射甲泼尼龙的组比安慰剂组视功能恢复得更快;视野缺损的恢复情况尤其如此(P = 0.0001)。尽管随着时间推移,组间差异有所减小,但在6个月时,接受静脉注射甲泼尼龙的组在视野(P = 0.054)、对比敏感度(P = 0.026)和色觉(P = 0.033)方面仍略好,但视力方面无差异(P = 0.66)。口服泼尼松组的结果与安慰剂组无差异。此外,接受口服泼尼松的组中,任何一只眼睛发生视神经炎新发作的比率高于安慰剂组,但接受静脉注射甲泼尼龙的组并非如此(口服泼尼松与安慰剂相比的相对风险为1.79;95%置信区间为1.08至2.95)。

结论

静脉注射甲泼尼龙后口服泼尼松可加速因视神经炎导致的视力丧失的恢复,并在6个月时使视力略好。本研究中所采用的单纯口服泼尼松是一种无效的治疗方法,且会增加视神经炎新发作的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验