• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于直肠脱垂患者行或不行乙状结肠切除术的腹直肌固定术的前瞻性随机研究。

A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse.

作者信息

McKee R F, Lauder J C, Poon F W, Aitchison M A, Finlay I G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow.

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Feb;174(2):145-8.

PMID:1734574
Abstract

Eighteen patients with full-thickness prolapse of the rectum were randomized to rectopexy alone (group 1) or with sigmoidectomy (group 2). Three months postoperatively, seven patients in group 1 and two in group 2 complained of severe constipation. One patient in group 1 and three patients in group 2 remained incontinent. The results of colonic marker studies showed a significant increase in the number of markers at day 5 for those in group 1 (preoperative, 7.7 +/- 2.6; postoperative, 14.6 +/- 2.2; t test, p less than 00.1) but no significant increase in group 2 (preoperative, 4.6 +/- 2.2; postoperative 6.8 +/- 2.3; t test, p less than 0.01). No significant changes or differences between the groups were seen in the anorectal angle on videoproctogram. The results of anorectal physiologic studies done postoperatively showed no differences between the groups in maximum resting pressure, sphincter length or saline solution infusion test; however, the patients in group 1 had a significantly greater rectal compliance (group 1, 0.24 +/- 0.02 millimeters mercury per milliliter; group 2, 0.1 +/- 0.02 millimeters mercury per milliliter; p less than 00.1). This may occur because the redundant loop of sigmoid colon causes hold-up of intestinal content and kinking at the junction between the sigmoid colon and the rectum.

摘要

18例直肠全层脱垂患者被随机分为单纯直肠固定术组(第1组)或直肠固定术联合乙状结肠切除术组(第2组)。术后3个月,第1组有7例患者、第2组有2例患者主诉严重便秘。第1组有1例患者、第2组有3例患者仍存在大便失禁。结肠标志物研究结果显示,第1组患者在术后第5天标志物数量显著增加(术前,7.7±2.6;术后,14.6±2.2;t检验,p<0.01),而第2组无显著增加(术前,4.6±2.2;术后,6.8±2.3;t检验,p<0.01)。在排粪造影中,两组间肛管直肠角未见显著变化或差异。术后进行的肛管直肠生理学研究结果显示,两组在最大静息压、括约肌长度或生理盐水灌注试验方面无差异;然而,第1组患者的直肠顺应性显著更高(第1组,0.24±0.02毫米汞柱/毫升;第2组,0.1±0.02毫米汞柱/毫升;p<0.01)。这可能是因为冗长的乙状结肠袢导致肠内容物潴留以及乙状结肠与直肠交界处扭结。

相似文献

1
A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse.一项关于直肠脱垂患者行或不行乙状结肠切除术的腹直肌固定术的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Feb;174(2):145-8.
2
[Surgical therapy of rectal prolapse using rectopexy and resection. Effect of resection treatment on postoperative constipation and sphincter muscle function--a follow-up study of 112 patients].[采用直肠固定术和切除术治疗直肠脱垂。切除治疗对术后便秘和括约肌功能的影响——112例患者的随访研究]
Chirurg. 1995 Jan;66(1):27-33.
3
Long-term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 Jan;87(1):101-4.
4
Abdominal rectopexy and sigmoid resection (Frykman-Goldberg operation) for rectal prolapse.
Acta Chir Scand. 1988 Mar;154(3):221-4.
5
Prospective study of the effect of rectopexy on colonic motility in patients with rectal prolapse.直肠脱垂患者行直肠固定术对结肠动力影响的前瞻性研究。
Br J Surg. 2005 Nov;92(11):1417-22. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4990.
6
Sutured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex rectopexy for rectal prolapse.与使用 Marlex 直肠固定术治疗直肠脱垂相比,缝合后腹部直肠固定术联合乙状结肠切除术治疗直肠脱垂的疗效对比。
Br J Surg. 1990 Feb;77(2):143-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770209.
7
Prosthetic rectopexy to the pelvic floor and sigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse.直肠脱垂的盆底人工直肠固定术和乙状结肠切除术。
Am J Surg. 2001 Nov;182(5):465-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00746-2.
8
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction.腹腔镜下腹直肌固定术、后盆腔修补术及阴道骶骨固定术治疗直肠生殖器脱垂和机械性出口梗阻。
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Feb;10(2):138-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01259.x. Epub 2007 May 10.
9
[The functional and manometric results of 2 surgical methods of posterior abdominal rectopexy].[两种经腹直肠后固定术式的功能及测压结果]
Minerva Chir. 1994 May;49(5):383-92.
10
Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992 Dec;7(4):219-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00341225.

引用本文的文献

1
Mesh Rectopexy or Resection Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse; Is There a Gold Standard Method: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.直肠脱垂的网片直肠固定术或切除直肠固定术;是否存在金标准方法:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 28;13(5):1363. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051363.
2
A network meta-analysis of surgical treatments of complete rectal prolapse.完全直肠脱垂的手术治疗的网状荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Oct;27(10):787-797. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02813-2. Epub 2023 May 8.
3
Predictive factors for functional failure of ventral mesh rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation.
预测直肠前突和出口梗阻型便秘行腹侧网片直肠固定术后功能失败的因素。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Dec;26(12):973-979. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02708-8. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
4
A Case of Robotic Posterior Rectopexy for Full-thickness Rectal Prolapse.机器人辅助直肠后壁固定术治疗完全性直肠脱垂1例
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2022 Jan 28;6(1):72-76. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2021-028. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparison of four surgical approaches for rectal prolapse: multicentre randomized clinical trial.四种直肠前突手术方法的比较:多中心随机临床试验。
BJS Open. 2022 Jan 6;6(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab140.
6
Update on Robotic Rectal Prolapse Treatment.机器人辅助直肠脱垂治疗的最新进展
J Pers Med. 2021 Jul 23;11(8):706. doi: 10.3390/jpm11080706.
7
Suture rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for complete full-thickness rectal prolapse and intussusception: systematic review and meta-analysis.缝线直肠固定术与腹侧网片直肠固定术治疗完全全层直肠脱垂和套叠:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa037.
8
Anorectal Physiology Testing for Prolapse-What Tests are Necessary?用于脱垂的肛肠生理学检测——哪些检测是必要的?
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021 Jan;34(1):15-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714246. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
9
Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse.意大利结直肠外科学会(SICCR)共识声明:完全性直肠脱垂的处理与治疗。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Dec;22(12):919-931. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1908-9. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
10
Management of patients with rectal prolapse: the 2017 Dutch guidelines.直肠脱垂患者的管理:2017 年荷兰指南。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Aug;22(8):589-596. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1830-1. Epub 2018 Aug 11.