• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[脂质体对耻垢分枝杆菌生长及对异烟肼敏感性的影响]

[The effect of liposomes on the growth and sensitivity of Mycobacterium smegmatis to isoniazide].

作者信息

Troshkina O A, Salina E G, Sorokoumova G M, Kaprel'iants A S, Selishcheva A A

出版信息

Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol. 2007 Jan-Feb;43(1):47-52.

PMID:17345858
Abstract

The effects of the liposome form of isoniazide (IN) and liposomes without IN on the growth of Mycobacterium smegmatis were studied. Fluorescent assay demonstrated that the fraction of liposomes that interacted with M. smegmatis amounted to 1-3%. It was shown that the IN efficiency in a liposomal form decreased depending on the liposome composition and concentration as compared with the IN in water solution. A preincubation of mycobacteria with liposomes led to a decrease in their sensitivity to IN. An analogous effect was observed when incubating M. smegmatis with oleic acid. It was postulated that the relative resistance of M. smegmatis to the antibiotic when using lipids as a carbon substrate appeared due to a change in the agent's metabolism and should be taken into account when testing in vitro the liposomal forms of antibiotics.

摘要

研究了异烟肼(IN)脂质体形式以及不含IN的脂质体对耻垢分枝杆菌生长的影响。荧光分析表明,与耻垢分枝杆菌相互作用的脂质体比例为1%-3%。结果显示,与水溶液中的IN相比,脂质体形式的IN效率会根据脂质体的组成和浓度而降低。分枝杆菌与脂质体预孵育会导致其对IN的敏感性降低。用油酸孵育耻垢分枝杆菌时也观察到类似效果。据推测,当使用脂质作为碳源时,耻垢分枝杆菌对抗生素的相对抗性是由于药物代谢的改变而出现的,在体外测试抗生素脂质体形式时应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
[The effect of liposomes on the growth and sensitivity of Mycobacterium smegmatis to isoniazide].[脂质体对耻垢分枝杆菌生长及对异烟肼敏感性的影响]
Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol. 2007 Jan-Feb;43(1):47-52.
2
[Role of carbon substrates of culture media on Mycobacterium smegmatis susceptibility to antitubercular agents].[培养基碳源对耻垢分枝杆菌抗结核药物敏感性的作用]
Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 2007 Nov-Dec(6):7-11.
3
AsnB is involved in natural resistance of Mycobacterium smegmatis to multiple drugs.天冬酰胺酶B参与耻垢分枝杆菌对多种药物的天然耐药性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Jan;50(1):250-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.1.250-255.2006.
4
Synthesis of isonicotinoylhydrazones from anacardic acid and their in vitro activity against Mycobacterium smegmatis.从漆树酸合成异烟酰腙及其对耻垢分枝杆菌的体外活性。
Eur J Med Chem. 2007 Mar;42(3):420-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2006.09.009. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
5
Antibacterial Effects of Liposomes Containing Phospholipid Cardiolipin and Fluoroquinolone Levofloxacin on Mycobacterium tuberculosis with Extensive Drug Resistance.含磷脂心磷脂和氟喹诺酮左氧氟沙星的脂质体对广泛耐药结核分枝杆菌的抗菌作用
Bull Exp Biol Med. 2016 Mar;160(5):675-8. doi: 10.1007/s10517-016-3247-z. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
6
[Evaluation of the efficiency of activity of the liposomal form of isoniazid against different types of mycobacteria in vitro].[体外评估异烟肼脂质体形式对不同类型分枝杆菌的活性效率]
Probl Tuberk Bolezn Legk. 2006(8):61-4.
7
The alanine racemase of Mycobacterium smegmatis is essential for growth in the absence of D-alanine.耻垢分枝杆菌的丙氨酸消旋酶在缺乏D-丙氨酸的情况下对生长至关重要。
J Bacteriol. 2007 Nov;189(22):8381-6. doi: 10.1128/JB.01201-07. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
8
Thioridazine and chlorpromazine inhibition of ethidium bromide efflux in Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium smegmatis.硫利达嗪和氯丙嗪对鸟分枝杆菌和耻垢分枝杆菌中溴化乙锭外排的抑制作用。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 May;61(5):1076-82. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn070. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
9
Isoniazid accumulation in Mycobacterium smegmatis is modulated by proton motive force-driven and ATP-dependent extrusion systems.异烟肼在耻垢分枝杆菌中的积累受到质子动力驱动和ATP依赖的外排系统的调节。
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999 Mar 24;256(3):682-4. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0357.
10
Characterization of Mycobacterium smegmatis mutants defective in 1-d-myo-inosityl-2-amino-2-deoxy-alpha-d-glucopyranoside and mycothiol biosynthesis.耻垢分枝杆菌在1-D-肌醇-2-氨基-2-脱氧-α-D-吡喃葡萄糖苷和霉菌硫醇生物合成方面存在缺陷的突变体的特性分析
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999 Feb 16;255(2):239-44. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0156.