Foote Allison L, Crystal Jonathon D
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 20;17(6):551-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.061. Epub 2007 Mar 8.
The ability to reflect on one's own mental processes, termed metacognition, is a defining feature of human existence [1, 2]. Consequently, a fundamental question in comparative cognition is whether nonhuman animals have knowledge of their own cognitive states [3]. Recent evidence suggests that people and nonhuman primates [4-8] but not less "cognitively sophisticated" species [3, 9, 10] are capable of metacognition. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that rats are capable of metacognition--i.e., they know when they do not know the answer in a duration-discrimination test. Before taking the duration test, rats were given the opportunity to decline the test. On other trials, they were not given the option to decline the test. Accurate performance on the duration test yielded a large reward, whereas inaccurate performance resulted in no reward. Declining a test yielded a small but guaranteed reward. If rats possess knowledge regarding whether they know the answer to the test, they would be expected to decline most frequently on difficult tests and show lowest accuracy on difficult tests that cannot be declined [4]. Our data provide evidence for both predictions and suggest that a nonprimate has knowledge of its own cognitive state.
反思自身心理过程的能力,即元认知,是人类存在的一个决定性特征[1,2]。因此,比较认知中的一个基本问题是非人类动物是否了解自己的认知状态[3]。最近的证据表明,人类和非人类灵长类动物[4-8]具备元认知能力,而认知能力稍逊的物种则不然[3,9,10]。在此,我们首次证明大鼠具备元认知能力——也就是说,在时长辨别测试中,它们知道自己何时不知道答案。在进行时长测试前,大鼠有机会拒绝测试。在其他试验中,它们没有拒绝测试的选项。时长测试中表现准确会获得丰厚奖励,而表现不准确则没有奖励。拒绝测试会获得少量但有保证的奖励。如果大鼠知道自己是否知道测试答案,那么预计它们在难度大的测试中会最频繁地拒绝测试,并且在无法拒绝的难度大的测试中准确率最低[4]。我们的数据为这两个预测提供了证据,并表明一种非灵长类动物了解其自身的认知状态。