Kilickap Mustafa, Turhan Sibel, Sayin Tamer, Nergizoglu Gokhan, Kutlay Sim, Duman Neval, Rahimov Uzeyir, Kumbasar Deniz, Akgun Gunes, Erol Cetin
Cardiology Department, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Mar 1;23(3):219-22. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70748-1.
Increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and may be used for risk stratification. Two-dimensional echocardiography, the most commonly used technique for estimation of LVM, uses the third power of the left ventricular internal diameter (LVID) for the calculation.
To determine whether a decrease in intravascular volume after dialysis may cause inaccurate estimation of LVM by echocardiography.
Thirty-eight patients undergoing hemodialysis due to chronic renal failure constituted the study group (14 women [37%] and 24 men [63%], mean age +/- SD 38.7+/-10.9 years). LVID, and interventricular and posterior wall thicknesses were measured by two-dimensionally guided M-mode echocardiography. Stroke volume and cardiac output were calculated using left ventricular outflow tract diameter and the pulsed-wave Doppler time-velocity integral obtained from left ventricular outflow tract. LVM was calculated by using Devereux's formula, and was indexed for body surface area and height. All echocardiographic parameters were measured or calculated before and after dialysis (on the same day), and then compared.
There were no significant changes in wall thickness; however, LVID, LVM, the LVM/body surface index and the LVM/height index significantly decreased after dialysis (P<0.001 for each parameter). There was a significant correlation between the change in LVID and the change in LVM (P<0.001, r=0.59). Stroke volume and cardiac output also decreased significantly after hemodialysis (P<0.001 for each parameter).
Intravascular volume-dependent change in LVID causes inaccurate estimation of LVM, so volume status should be kept in mind, especially in serial assessment of LVM.
左心室质量(LVM)增加是心血管疾病发病和死亡的独立危险因素,可用于风险分层。二维超声心动图是评估LVM最常用的技术,其通过左心室内径(LVID)的三次方来计算。
确定透析后血管内容量减少是否会导致超声心动图对LVM的估计不准确。
38例因慢性肾衰竭接受血液透析的患者组成研究组(14名女性[37%]和24名男性[63%],平均年龄±标准差38.7±10.9岁)。通过二维引导M型超声心动图测量LVID、室间隔厚度和后壁厚度。使用左心室流出道直径和从左心室流出道获得的脉冲波多普勒时间速度积分计算每搏输出量和心输出量。LVM采用Devereux公式计算,并根据体表面积和身高进行指数化。所有超声心动图参数在透析前和透析后(同一天)进行测量或计算,然后进行比较。
壁厚无显著变化;然而,透析后LVID、LVM、LVM/体表面积指数和LVM/身高指数显著降低(每个参数P<0.001)。LVID的变化与LVM的变化之间存在显著相关性(P<0.001,r=0.59)。血液透析后每搏输出量和心输出量也显著降低(每个参数P<0.001)。
LVID的血管内容量依赖性变化导致对LVM的估计不准确,因此应考虑容量状态,尤其是在对LVM进行连续评估时。