Stiffler Kirk A, Jwayyed Sharhabeel, Wilber Scott T, Robinson Angela
Department of Emergency Medicine, Summa Health System, Akron, OH 44309-2090, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;25(3):331-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.07.010.
This study was conducted to assess the ultrasound's (US's) ability to identify pertinent landmarks for lumbar puncture (LP) in patients of various body mass indices (BMIs) and establish spatial relationships of pertinent LP landmarks across BMIs.
In this institutional review board-approved cross-sectional study, we calculated the BMIs of eligible patients and then categorized them as normal (BMI < or =24.9), overweight (BMI 24.9-30), or obese (BMI > or =30). We recorded the difficulty in palpating traditional LP landmarks. Identification and measurement of the spatial relationships of the sacrum; spinous processes of lumbar vertebrae L3, L4, and L5; ligamentum flavum; and the spinal canal by US was attempted.
Successful identification of pertinent structures (L4-L5 spinous processes and the spinal canal) occurred in 100% of patients with normal BMI, 95% of those who were overweight, and 74% of those who were obese (P = .011). Difficulty in palpating landmarks was noted in 5% of patients with normal BMI, 33% of those who were overweight, and 68% of those who were obese (P < .0001). In subjects with difficult-to-palpate landmarks, US identified pertinent structures in 16 of 21 (76%; 95% confidence interval, 53-92). The average distance from skin to ligamentum flavum was 44 mm in those with normal BMI, 51 mm in those who were overweight, and 64 mm in those who were obese (P < .00001); measurements between spinous processes did not vary by BMI. Overall, there was a moderate correlation (0.62) between BMI and the distance from skin to ligamentum flavum.
The usefulness of US in identifying structures for LP is inversely related to BMI. Even with this limitation, US is still able to identify obese patients' pertinent landmarks almost 75% of the time. In addition, US may be helpful in identifying pertinent structures for LP in those patients with difficult-to-palpate landmarks. In patients who were obese with structures not palpable by hand or identifiable by US, other modalities should be considered.
本研究旨在评估超声识别不同体重指数(BMI)患者腰椎穿刺(LP)相关标志的能力,并确定不同BMI患者LP相关标志的空间关系。
在这项经机构审查委员会批准的横断面研究中,我们计算了符合条件患者的BMI,然后将他们分为正常(BMI≤24.9)、超重(BMI 24.9 - 30)或肥胖(BMI≥30)。我们记录了触诊传统LP标志的困难程度。尝试通过超声识别和测量骶骨、腰椎L3、L4和L5棘突、黄韧带以及椎管的空间关系。
BMI正常的患者中100%成功识别出相关结构(L4 - L5棘突和椎管),超重患者中95%成功识别,肥胖患者中74%成功识别(P = 0.011)。BMI正常的患者中5%触诊标志困难,超重患者中33%触诊困难,肥胖患者中68%触诊困难(P < 0.0001)。在触诊标志困难的受试者中,超声在21例中的16例(76%;95%置信区间,53 - 92)识别出相关结构。BMI正常者从皮肤到黄韧带的平均距离为44 mm,超重者为51 mm,肥胖者为64 mm(P < 0.00001);棘突之间的测量值不因BMI而异。总体而言,BMI与从皮肤到黄韧带的距离之间存在中度相关性(0.62)。
超声识别LP相关结构的有用性与BMI呈负相关。即便有此局限性,超声仍能在近75%的时间内识别肥胖患者的相关标志。此外,超声可能有助于识别触诊标志困难患者的LP相关结构。对于肥胖且手动无法触诊或超声无法识别相关结构的患者,应考虑其他方法。