Suppr超能文献

胸主动脉夹层的诊断。磁共振成像与经食管超声心动图对比

Diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection. Magnetic resonance imaging versus transesophageal echocardiography.

作者信息

Nienaber C A, Spielmann R P, von Kodolitsch Y, Siglow V, Piepho A, Jaup T, Nicolas V, Weber P, Triebel H J, Bleifeld W

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, FRG.

出版信息

Circulation. 1992 Feb;85(2):434-47. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.2.434.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic dissection requires prompt and reliable diagnosis to reduce the high mortality. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of both ECG-triggered magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transesophageal two-dimensional echocardiography combined with color-coded Doppler flow imaging (TEE) for the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection and associated epiphenomena.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-three consecutive patients with clinically suspected aortic dissection were subjected to a dual noninvasive imaging protocol in random order; imaging results were compared and validated against the independent morphological "gold standard" of intraoperative findings (n = 27), necropsy (n = 7), and/or contrast angiography (n = 53). No serious side effects were encountered with either imaging method. In contrast to a precursory screening transthoracic echogram, the sensitivities of both MRI and TEE were 100% for detecting a dissection of the thoracic aorta irrespective of its location. The specificity of TEE, however, was lower than the specificity of MRI for a dissection (TEE, 68.2% versus MRI, 100%; p less than 0.005), which resulted mainly from false-positive TEE findings confined to the ascending segment of the aorta (TEE, 78.8% versus MRI, 100%; p less than 0.01). In addition, MRI proved to be more sensitive than TEE in detecting the formation of thrombus in the false lumen of both the aortic arch (p less than 0.01) and the descending segment of the aorta (p less than 0.05). There were no discrepancies between the two imaging techniques in detecting the site of entry to a dissection, aortic regurgitation, or pericardial effusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Both MRI and TEE are atraumatic, safe, and highly sensitive methods to identify and classify acute and subacute dissections of the entire thoracic aorta. TEE, however, is associated with lower specificity for lesions in the ascending aorta. These results may still favor TEE as a semi-invasive diagnostic procedure after a precursory screening transthoracic echogram in suspected aortic dissection, but they establish MRI as an excellent method to avoid false-positive findings. Anatomic mapping by MRI may emerge as the most comprehensive approach and morphological standard to guide surgical interventions.

摘要

背景

主动脉夹层需要迅速且可靠的诊断以降低高死亡率。本研究的目的是评估心电图触发磁共振成像(MRI)以及经食管二维超声心动图联合彩色编码多普勒血流成像(TEE)对胸主动脉夹层及相关伴随现象诊断的可靠性。

方法与结果

53例临床怀疑主动脉夹层的连续患者按随机顺序接受了双重无创成像检查;将成像结果与术中发现(n = 27)、尸检(n = 7)和/或对比血管造影(n = 53)这一独立形态学“金标准”进行比较并验证。两种成像方法均未出现严重副作用。与初步筛查经胸超声心动图相比,MRI和TEE检测胸主动脉夹层的敏感性均为100%,无论夹层位于何处。然而,TEE对夹层的特异性低于MRI(TEE为68.2%,MRI为100%;p < 0.005),这主要是由于TEE的假阳性结果主要局限于主动脉升段(TEE为78.8%,MRI为100%;p < 0.01)。此外,MRI在检测主动脉弓假腔(p < 0.01)和降主动脉段(p < 0.05)内血栓形成方面比TEE更敏感。在检测夹层入口部位、主动脉反流或心包积液方面,两种成像技术之间没有差异。

结论

MRI和TEE都是识别和分类整个胸主动脉急性和亚急性夹层的无创、安全且高度敏感的方法。然而,TEE对升主动脉病变的特异性较低。这些结果可能仍支持在疑似主动脉夹层经初步筛查经胸超声心动图后,将TEE作为一种半侵入性诊断方法,但它们确立了MRI作为避免假阳性结果的优秀方法。MRI的解剖学定位可能成为指导手术干预的最全面方法和形态学标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验