Butow Phyllis N, Kirsten Laura T, Ussher Jane M, Wain Gerard V, Sandoval Mirjana, Hobbs Kim M, Hodgkinson Katharine, Stenlake Annie
Medical Psychology Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Psychooncology. 2007 Nov;16(11):1039-45. doi: 10.1002/pon.1172.
To explore views on the ideal structure and process of support groups for cancer patients.
From 184 cancer support groups identified in NSW, Australia, 50 were randomly selected within strata of five variations in group structure: homogenous versus heterogenous participants; urban versus rural; community versus hospital setting, leader with cancer experience or not; and with professional training or not. Four hundred and seventy-six group members completed a questionnaire.
Participants valued being with others like them, gaining information about cancer and having an effective leader. Groups were seen to be currently failing people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, and links with oncology health professionals were inadequate. Few clear preferences for structure were expressed, except for the non-exclusion of those with a poor prognosis. Patients tended to prefer the structure of their own group, but patients longer since diagnosis, those with better informal support and carers preferred to meet in the community setting, while men with prostate cancer preferred a medical setting.
Some suggestions for group structure and process can be made on the basis of these findings; however, individual variation suggests that a needs analysis should be made by individual groups.
探讨对癌症患者支持小组理想结构和流程的看法。
在澳大利亚新南威尔士州确定的184个癌症支持小组中,在小组结构的五种变化层次内随机选取50个小组,这五种变化包括:参与者同质与异质;城市与农村;社区与医院环境;组长有无癌症经历;有无专业培训。476名小组成员完成了一份问卷。
参与者重视与同病相怜的人在一起、获取癌症相关信息以及有一位得力的组长。目前,支持小组被认为未能满足来自文化和语言背景多样人群的需求,并且与肿瘤健康专业人员的联系不足。除了不排除预后较差的患者外,对于小组结构几乎没有明确的偏好表达。患者倾向于喜欢自己所在小组的结构,但确诊时间较长的患者、有较好非正式支持的患者以及护理人员更喜欢在社区环境中聚会,而前列腺癌男性患者更喜欢在医疗环境中聚会。
基于这些发现可以对小组结构和流程提出一些建议;然而,个体差异表明各个小组应进行需求分析。