Spencer-Rodgers Julie, Hamilton David L, Sherman Steven J
Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(3):369-88. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.369.
Research indicates that people's intuitive beliefs about groups are organized according to a group typology (B. Lickel, D. L. Hamilton, & S. J. Sherman, 2001). In Study 1, the authors compared and contrasted people's spontaneous cognitive representations of two group types, task groups and social categories. Analyses revealed significant differences as well as commonalities in people's beliefs about the group types. Notably, perceivers used more abstract, enduring language and contextually rich descriptors when characterizing social categories than when describing task groups. In Study 2, the authors investigated the differential roles of distinct group perception variables (entitativity, homogeneity, essence, role differentiation, and agency) as predictors of stereotyping for the different group types. Entitativity and all of the group perception variables significantly predicted stereotyping for both social categories and task groups. However, perceptions of entitativity mediated the association between the group perception variables and stereotypic judgments. These findings demonstrate that laypeople hold stereotype-like mental representations of group types other than social categories and that entitativity plays a crucial mediating role in stereotyping across different types of groups.
研究表明,人们对群体的直观信念是根据一种群体类型学来组织的(B. 利克尔、D. L. 汉密尔顿和S. J. 谢尔曼,2001)。在研究1中,作者比较并对比了人们对两种群体类型,即任务群体和社会类别的自发认知表征。分析揭示了人们对这些群体类型的信念中存在的显著差异和共性。值得注意的是,与描述任务群体时相比,感知者在描述社会类别时使用了更抽象、持久的语言以及情境丰富的描述词。在研究2中,作者研究了不同的群体感知变量(实体性、同质性、本质、角色分化和能动性)作为不同群体类型刻板印象预测指标的不同作用。实体性以及所有群体感知变量都显著预测了社会类别和任务群体的刻板印象。然而,对实体性的感知在群体感知变量和刻板印象判断之间的关联中起中介作用。这些发现表明,外行人对除社会类别之外的群体类型持有类似刻板印象的心理表征,并且实体性在不同类型群体的刻板印象形成中起着关键的中介作用。