• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再认记忆中的测试效应:一种双加工解释。

The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.

作者信息

Chan Jason C K, McDermott Kathleen B

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):431-7. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.431.

DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.431
PMID:17352622
Abstract

The testing effect, or the finding that taking an initial test improves subsequent memory performance, is a robust and reliable phenomenon--as long as the final test involves recall. Few studies have examined the effects of taking an initial recall test on final recognition performance, and results from these studies are equivocal. In 3 experiments, we attempt to demonstrate that initial testing can change the ways in which later recognition decisions are executed even when no difference can be detected in the recognition hit rates. Specifically, initial testing was shown to enhance later recollection but leave familiarity unchanged. This conclusion emerged from three dependent measures: source memory, exclusion performance, and remember/know judgments.

摘要

测试效应,即初次测试能提高后续记忆表现这一发现,是一个稳健且可靠的现象——只要最终测试涉及回忆。很少有研究考察初次回忆测试对最终识别表现的影响,且这些研究的结果并不明确。在3项实验中,我们试图证明,即使在识别命中率上未检测到差异,初次测试也能改变后续识别决策的执行方式。具体而言,研究表明初次测试能增强后续的回忆,但不会改变熟悉度。这一结论源自三项相关测量:来源记忆、排除表现以及“记得/知道”判断。

相似文献

1
The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.再认记忆中的测试效应:一种双加工解释。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):431-7. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.431.
2
Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: evidence for a reduction in general memory strength.项目识别中的提取诱发遗忘:一般记忆强度降低的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):863-75. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.863.
3
What you get out of memory depends on the question you ask.你从记忆中获取的东西取决于你提出的问题。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):797-812. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.797.
4
The effects of free recall testing on subsequent source memory.自由回忆测试对随后的来源记忆的影响。
Memory. 2010 May;18(4):385-93. doi: 10.1080/09658211003702163. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
5
When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.测试在何时增强记忆保持?基于分布的解释:检索作为一种记忆增强剂。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):801-12. doi: 10.1037/a0023219.
6
Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material.提取诱发促进效应:最初未测试的材料可以从先前对相关材料的测试中受益。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):553-71. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.553.
7
Binding of multidimensional context information as a distinctive characteristic of remember judgments.多维情境信息的绑定作为记忆判断的一个显著特征。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):32-49. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.32.
8
Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection.识别记忆的信号检测、阈值和双加工模型:ROC曲线与意识性回忆
Conscious Cogn. 1996 Dec;5(4):418-41. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0026.
9
Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference.在学习过程中进行测试可防止前摄干扰的积累。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1392-9. doi: 10.1037/a0013082.
10
Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.测试强化学习:进行记忆测试可提高长期记忆保持能力。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):249-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Sorry, Am I Intruding? Comparing Performance and Intrusion Rates for Pretested and Posttested Information.抱歉,我打扰到您了吗?比较预测试和后测试信息的性能与侵入率。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;15(8):1060. doi: 10.3390/bs15081060.
2
Interpolated Retrieval of Relevant Material, Not Irrelevant Material, Enhances New Learning of a Video Lecture In-Person and Online.插入相关而非不相关的材料,可增强线下和线上视频讲座的新学习效果。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 14;15(5):668. doi: 10.3390/bs15050668.
3
The benefits of elaborative encoding over retrieval practice for associative learning.
在联想学习中,精细编码相对于检索练习的优势。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Dec 6. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01671-z.
4
The impact of working memory testing on long-term associative memory.工作记忆测试对长期联想记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Oct;52(7):1626-1652. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01568-x. Epub 2024 May 6.
5
The limited memory of value following value directed encoding.价值导向编码后的价值记忆有限。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1387-1407. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01550-7. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
6
The testing effect for visual materials depends on preexisting knowledge.视觉材料的测试效应取决于已有知识。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Oct;49(10):1557-1571. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001248. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
7
Study Based on Gamification of Tests through and Reward Game Cards as an Innovative Tool in Physiotherapy Students: A Preliminary Study.基于通过测试游戏化和奖励游戏卡作为物理治疗专业学生创新工具的研究:一项初步研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 15;11(4):578. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040578.
8
Measuring memory is harder than you think: How to avoid problematic measurement practices in memory research.衡量记忆比你想象的要难:如何避免记忆研究中的有问题的测量实践。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Apr;30(2):421-449. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02179-w. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
9
Corticosteroids use and neurocognitive functioning in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: Evidence from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 26101.复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者使用皮质类固醇与神经认知功能:来自欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)26101试验的证据。
Neurooncol Pract. 2022 Mar 13;9(4):310-316. doi: 10.1093/nop/npac022. eCollection 2022 Aug.
10
Are witnesses able to avoid highly accessible misinformation? Examining the efficacy of different warnings for high and low accessibility postevent misinformation.目击者能否避免易获取的错误信息?检验不同警告对高、低易获取性事件后错误信息的效果。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):45-58. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01255-1. Epub 2022 Jan 7.