• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自由回忆测试对随后的来源记忆的影响。

The effects of free recall testing on subsequent source memory.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013, USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2010 May;18(4):385-93. doi: 10.1080/09658211003702163. Epub 2010 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1080/09658211003702163
PMID:20408041
Abstract

The testing effect is the finding that prior retrieval of information from memory will result in better subsequent memory for that material. One explanation for these effects is that initial free recall testing increases the recollective details for tested information, which then becomes more available during a subsequent test phase. In three experiments we explored this hypothesis using a source-monitoring test phase after the initial free recall tests. We discovered that memory is differentially enhanced for certain recollective details depending on the nature of the free recall task. Thus further research needs to be conducted to specify how different kinds of memorial details are enhanced by free recall testing.

摘要

测试效应是指从记忆中检索信息会导致对该材料的后续记忆更好的发现。这些效应的一种解释是,初始的自由回忆测试增加了被测试信息的回忆细节,然后在随后的测试阶段变得更加可用。在三个实验中,我们在初始的自由回忆测试后使用源监测测试阶段来探索这个假设。我们发现,记忆对某些回忆细节的增强取决于自由回忆任务的性质。因此,需要进一步研究如何通过自由回忆测试来增强不同类型的记忆细节。

相似文献

1
The effects of free recall testing on subsequent source memory.自由回忆测试对随后的来源记忆的影响。
Memory. 2010 May;18(4):385-93. doi: 10.1080/09658211003702163. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
2
Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material.提取诱发促进效应:最初未测试的材料可以从先前对相关材料的测试中受益。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):553-71. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.553.
3
The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.再认记忆中的测试效应:一种双加工解释。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):431-7. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.431.
4
When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.测试在何时增强记忆保持?基于分布的解释:检索作为一种记忆增强剂。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):801-12. doi: 10.1037/a0023219.
5
[Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].[注意力对精神分裂症患者听觉言语学习测试的影响]
Encephale. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):291-7.
6
Temporal associations and prior-list intrusions in free recall.自由回忆中的时间关联和先前列表干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):792-804. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.792.
7
Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference.在学习过程中进行测试可防止前摄干扰的积累。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1392-9. doi: 10.1037/a0013082.
8
Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.测试强化学习:进行记忆测试可提高长期记忆保持能力。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):249-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.
9
Failure to recall.回忆障碍
Psychol Rev. 2009 Jan;116(1):157-86. doi: 10.1037/a0014150.
10
Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.排练期间的同步大脑活动以及无关言语对短期记忆的干扰受回忆模式的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):188-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.001. Epub 2005 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Lower constraint testing enhances the testing effect for some contextual details but not others.较低约束测试增强了对某些上下文细节的测试效果,但对其他细节则不然。
Brain Behav. 2024 Jan;14(1):e3380. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3380.
2
Personal reminders: Self-generated reminders boost memory more than normatively related ones.个人提醒:自我生成的提醒比规范相关的提醒更能增强记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):645-659. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01120-7. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context?
审视情景背景账户:检索练习能否增强对背景的记忆?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Dec 18;4(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0202-3.
4
Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking.当测试具有适应性时更可取,并且与记笔记相比仍然可取。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02596. eCollection 2018.
5
Reducing the Misinformation Effect Through Initial Testing: Take Two Tests and Recall Me in the Morning?通过初次测试减少错误信息效应:做两次测试,早上再来找我?
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):61-69. doi: 10.1002/acp.3167. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
6
Retrieval practice enhances new learning: the forward effect of testing.检索练习可增强新的学习:测试的正向效应。
Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 4;5:286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00286. eCollection 2014.
7
Testing effects in mixed- versus pure-list designs.混合列表设计与纯列表设计中的测试效应
Mem Cognit. 2014 Aug;42(6):912-21. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0404-3.
8
Age invariance in semantic and episodic metamemory: both younger and older adults provide accurate feeling-of-knowing for names of faces.语义和情节记忆的年龄不变性:年轻和老年成年人都能准确地对人脸的名字产生熟悉感。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2014;21(1):27-51. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2013.775217. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
9
The effects of initial testing on false recall and false recognition in the social contagion of memory paradigm.初始测试对记忆范式中社会传染的虚假回忆和虚假识别的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Aug;41(6):820-31. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0299-4.
10
Experience with proactive interference diminishes its effects: mechanisms of change.前瞻性干扰的经验会降低其影响:改变的机制。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Feb;39(2):185-95. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0017-4.