O'Hegarty Michelle, Pederson Linda L, Yenokyan Gayane, Nelson David, Wortley Pascale
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Smoking and Health, 4770 Buford Hwy, NE, Mailstop K-50, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, USA.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Apr;4(2):A27. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
For the past 20 years, there have been no changes to the text-only cigarette warning labels in the United States. During this same time period, other countries placed large graphic warning labels on cigarette packages. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reactions of U.S. young adult smokers and nonsmokers aged 18 to 24 years to Canadian cigarette label text and graphic warnings. The study focused on determining their perceptions and the potential impact of Canadian labels on smoking, and study participants were asked for suggestions for modifications of U.S. cigarette warning labels so they would be effective for smoking deterrence and cessation.
During January and February 2002, 11 focus groups consisting of 54 smokers and 41 nonsmokers were conducted in the Detroit metropolitan area. Current smokers were defined as those who had smoked a cigarette within the past 30 days. Participants were asked about their knowledge and perceptions of current U.S. cigarette warning labels and their impressions of Canadian cigarette warning labels.
A content analysis and a word index were applied to the transcripts of all focus groups to identify and clarify themes and domains that appeared in group discussions and to compare results across different groups.
Focus group participants reported that Canadian cigarette warning labels were more visible and informative than U.S. cigarette warning labels. Messages perceived to be relevant to smokers were considered effective. Education level did not appear related to how participants responded to warning labels. There were some differences for warning labels that had sex-specific messages.
Warning labels are one component of comprehensive tobacco control and smoking cessation efforts. Stronger warnings on cigarette packages need to be part of a larger U.S. public health educational effort.
在过去20年里,美国仅文字形式的香烟警示标签一直未变。在此期间,其他国家在香烟包装上贴上了大幅图片警示标签。本研究的目的是调查美国18至24岁的年轻成年吸烟者和非吸烟者对加拿大香烟标签文字及图片警示的反应。该研究着重确定他们对加拿大标签的看法以及对吸烟的潜在影响,并询问研究参与者对修改美国香烟警示标签的建议,以便使其在阻止吸烟和戒烟方面有效。
2002年1月和2月期间,在底特律都会区进行了11个焦点小组访谈,其中包括54名吸烟者和41名非吸烟者。当前吸烟者定义为过去30天内吸过烟的人。参与者被问及他们对当前美国香烟警示标签的了解和看法,以及对加拿大香烟警示标签的印象。
对所有焦点小组访谈的文字记录进行内容分析和词汇索引,以识别和阐明小组讨论中出现的主题和领域,并比较不同小组的结果。
焦点小组参与者报告称,加拿大香烟警示标签比美国香烟警示标签更醒目且信息更丰富。被认为与吸烟者相关的信息被视为有效。教育水平似乎与参与者对警示标签的反应方式无关。对于带有针对性别信息的警示标签存在一些差异。
警示标签是全面烟草控制和戒烟努力的一个组成部分。香烟包装上更强有力的警示需要成为美国更大规模公共卫生教育努力的一部分。