Sierpina Victor, Levine Ruth, Astin John, Tan Alai
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1123, USA.
Explore (NY). 2007 Mar-Apr;3(2):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2006.12.001.
Mind-body medicine (MBM) approaches to many health problems have been well documented in the literature, including through multiple meta-analyses. Efficacy has been well demonstrated in conditions such as headache, irritable bowel syndrome, anxiety, fibromyalgia, hypertension, low back pain, depression, cancer symptoms, and postmyocardial infarction. However, an apparent disconnect (ie, translational block) prevents more widespread adoption of such therapies into practice. Biofeedback, relaxation therapy, hypnosis, guided imagery, cognitive behavioral therapy, and psychoeducational approaches are the domain of MBM we examined in assessing physician attitudes, beliefs, and practices.
Using a Web-based survey, we obtained responses from 74 faculty and resident physicians in the Department of Family Medicine and the Department of Psychiatry. Our response rate was 69%. We conducted descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, and multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model. Various statistics were chosen depending on the nature of analyzed variables. Synoptic tables are presented.
Comparing these cohorts, we found little difference between physicians in the two specialties, but substantial reports that barriers to the use of MBM were largely based on lack of training, inadequate expertise, and insufficient clinic time. Lack of expertise and insufficient clinic time were higher among family physicians than among psychiatrists. There was a high interest in both groups in learning relaxation techniques and meditation and lower interest in biofeedback and hypnosis. Female physicians were significantly more likely to use MBM, both with patients and for their own self-care, and were less likely to be concerned that recommending these therapies would make patients feel that their symptoms were being discounted. Female physicians also had significantly higher beliefs about the benefits of MBM on health disorders in several of the conditions examined, with a consistent though nonsignificant trend in others.
身心医学(MBM)针对多种健康问题的治疗方法在文献中已有充分记载,包括通过多项荟萃分析。其疗效在头痛、肠易激综合征、焦虑症、纤维肌痛、高血压、腰痛、抑郁症、癌症症状及心肌梗死后等病症中得到了充分证明。然而,一种明显的脱节(即转化障碍)阻碍了此类疗法在实践中的更广泛应用。生物反馈、放松疗法、催眠、引导式意象、认知行为疗法及心理教育方法是我们在评估医生态度、信念及实践时所考察的身心医学领域。
我们通过一项基于网络的调查,获得了家庭医学系和精神科的74名教职员工及住院医师的回复。我们的回复率为69%。我们使用逻辑回归模型进行了描述性统计、双变量分析和多变量分析。根据分析变量的性质选择了各种统计方法。呈现了一览表。
比较这些队列,我们发现两个专业的医生之间差异不大,但大量报告称,身心医学使用的障碍主要基于缺乏培训、专业知识不足及临床时间不够。家庭医生中缺乏专业知识和临床时间不够的情况比精神科医生更为严重。两组对学习放松技巧和冥想都有很高的兴趣,而对生物反馈和催眠的兴趣较低。女医生显著更有可能在治疗患者及自我保健时使用身心医学,并且不太可能担心推荐这些疗法会让患者觉得其症状被忽视。在几种所考察的病症中,女医生对身心医学对健康障碍益处的信念也显著更高,在其他病症中虽有一致趋势但不显著。