Van Driessche E, Houf K
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Poult Sci. 2007 Apr;86(4):744-51. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.4.744.
Both Campylobacter and Arcobacter are commonly present on broiler carcasses. For Campylobacter, the superficial contamination originates predominantly from fecal contamination during slaughter. In contrast with Campylobacter, the source of the Arcobacter contamination is not clear. In several studies, arcobacters have been isolated in poultry processing plants from the carcasses and slaughter equipment, but not from the intestinal content. In literature, contradictory reports about the Arcobacter colonization of the chicken gut have been published. In most of those studies, arcobacters were not isolated from cecal content nor from litter or the feathers, though some studies reported the isolation of arcobacters from cloacal swab samples. The present study assessed if arcobacters are part of the chicken intestine, skin, or feather flora. Because no isolation protocol has been validated for poultry intestinal content, a previously developed Arcobacter isolation procedure for feces from livestock animals was first validated. With this method, a good repeatability, in-lab reproducibility and sensitivity, and a good suppression of the chicken fecal accompanying flora were achieved when 125 mg/L of 5-fluorouracil, 10 mg/L of amphotericine B, 100 mg/L of cycloheximide, 16 mg/L of cefoperazone, 64 mg/L of novobiocine, and 64 mg/L of trimethoprim were applied. The validated method was used to examine the presence of arcobacters in and on living chickens of 4 flocks at slaughter age. Because arcobacters were not isolated from the intestinal tract nor from the skin or feathers of the birds, this study was not able to identify arcobacters as part of the intestinal or skin flora, nor could confirm the role of process water as reservoir. However, the results clearly demonstrated that the time period for processing the samples and the way of sample collection are crucial in the interpretation of epidemiological studies. As the reservoir of the carcass contamination remains unidentified, studies about the capacity of arcobacters to colonize the chicken intestinal tract may contribute in the assessment of the transmission routes of this emerging foodborn pathogen.
弯曲杆菌和弓形杆菌在肉鸡胴体上普遍存在。对于弯曲杆菌而言,其表面污染主要源于屠宰过程中的粪便污染。与弯曲杆菌不同,弓形杆菌污染的来源尚不清楚。在多项研究中,已在家禽加工厂的胴体和屠宰设备中分离出弓形杆菌,但未从肠道内容物中分离出来。在文献中,关于鸡肠道中弓形杆菌定殖的报道相互矛盾。在大多数此类研究中,虽有一些研究报告从泄殖腔拭子样本中分离出了弓形杆菌,但未从盲肠内容物、垫料或羽毛中分离出弓形杆菌。本研究评估了弓形杆菌是否为鸡肠道、皮肤或羽毛菌群的一部分。由于尚未验证适用于家禽肠道内容物的分离方案,因此首先对先前开发的用于家畜粪便的弓形杆菌分离程序进行了验证。使用该方法,当应用125 mg/L的5-氟尿嘧啶、10 mg/L的两性霉素B、100 mg/L的放线菌酮、16 mg/L的头孢哌酮、64 mg/L的新生霉素和64 mg/L的甲氧苄啶时,实现了良好的重复性、实验室内再现性和灵敏度,以及对鸡粪便伴随菌群的良好抑制。经验证的方法用于检查4个鸡群屠宰年龄的活鸡体内和体表是否存在弓形杆菌。由于未从鸟类的肠道、皮肤或羽毛中分离出弓形杆菌,本研究无法将弓形杆菌鉴定为肠道或皮肤菌群的一部分,也无法证实加工用水作为储存库的作用。然而,结果清楚地表明,样本处理的时间段和样本采集方式在流行病学研究的解释中至关重要。由于胴体污染的储存库仍未确定,关于弓形杆菌在鸡肠道定殖能力的研究可能有助于评估这种新出现的食源性病原体的传播途径。