Swanik Charles Buz, Covassin Tracey, Stearne David J, Schatz Philip
Department of Health, Nutrition & Exercise Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):943-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546507299532. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
Biomechanical analyses suggest that the loss of neuromuscular control is associated with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament sprains; however, previous research has not explored the link between neurocognitive function and unintentional knee injuries.
To determine if athletes who suffer a noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury demonstrate decreased baseline neurocognitive performance when compared with matched controls.
Case control study; Level of evidence, 3.
The baseline scores from a computerized neurocognitive test battery (ImPACT) were analyzed to compare verbal memory, visual memory, processing speed, and reaction time. Eighty intercollegiate athletes who, subsequent to testing, experienced noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries, were matched with 80 controls based on height, weight, age, gender, sport, position, and years of experience at the collegiate level.
Statistical differences were found between the noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury group and the matched controls on all 4 neurocognitive subtests. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament-injured athletes demonstrated significantly slower reaction time (F(1,158) = 9.66, P = .002) and processing speed (F(1,158) = 12.04, P = .001) and performed worse on visual (F(1,158) = 19.16, P = .000) and verbal memory (F(1,158) = 4.08, P = .045) composite scores when compared with controls.
Neurocognitive differences may be associated with the loss of neuromuscular control and coordination errors, predisposing certain intercollegiate athletes to noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries.
生物力学分析表明,神经肌肉控制能力的丧失与非接触性前交叉韧带扭伤有关;然而,以往的研究尚未探讨神经认知功能与意外膝关节损伤之间的联系。
确定与匹配的对照组相比,发生非接触性前交叉韧带损伤的运动员的基线神经认知表现是否下降。
病例对照研究;证据等级,3级。
分析计算机化神经认知测试组(ImPACT)的基线分数,以比较言语记忆、视觉记忆、处理速度和反应时间。80名大学生运动员在测试后发生了非接触性前交叉韧带损伤,根据身高、体重、年龄、性别、运动项目、位置和大学水平的参赛年限与80名对照组进行匹配。
在所有4项神经认知子测试中,非接触性前交叉韧带损伤组与匹配的对照组之间均存在统计学差异。与对照组相比,非接触性前交叉韧带损伤的运动员反应时间明显更慢(F(1,158)=9.66,P=.002)和处理速度更慢(F(1,158)=12.04,P=.001),并且在视觉(F(1,158)=19.16,P=.000)和言语记忆(F(1,158)=4.08,P=.045)综合得分上表现更差。
神经认知差异可能与神经肌肉控制能力的丧失和协调错误有关,使某些大学生运动员易发生非接触性前交叉韧带损伤。