文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

米替福新治疗皮肤利什曼病。

Miltefosine in cutaneous leishmaniasis.

作者信息

Rahman Simeen Ber, ul Bari Arfan, Mumtaz Nadeem

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Military Hospital, Rawalpindi.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007 Mar;17(3):132-5.


DOI:
PMID:17374296
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of oral Miltefosine in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis and its comparison with the most effective standard treatment, pentavalent antimony compound. DESIGN: A non-randomized, open label comparative clinical trial. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Dermatology Department, Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan from March to October 2005. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients, 12 years of age or older clinically and histopathologically diagnosed as cutaneous leishmaniasis were selected. Fifteen patients received orally administered Miltefosine 2.5mg/kg/day for 28 days and remaining 15 received injectable pentavalent antimony 20mg/kg/day for 28 days. Pre-treatment complete physical examination was done along with necessary laboratory investigations in all cases. These were repeated again after 2 weeks and at the end of treatment to note any deviation from the normal limits. Groups were almost matched in terms of age, weight, parasitological score. The efficacy was evaluated by ulcer size, before therapy, at 2 weeks and 4 weeks. Patients were followed-up at 3 and 6 months. Efficacy of two groups was statistically compared by calculating p-value by z-test. RESULTS: All patients completed the study without any serious complication. Lesions improved significantly and only scarring and post-inflammatory pigmentation was left. At 3 months, cure rate was 93% in group A and it was 73.33% in group B while at the end of 6 months, it was 86% and 66.6% respectively. This difference between efficacies of two groups was not found to be statistically significant (p-value>0.5). CONCLUSION: Miltefosine appears to be a safe and effective alternative to currently used therapies. The striking advantage of Miltefosine is its oral administration and it may also be helpful in regions where parasites are resistant to current agents.

摘要

目的:确定口服米替福新治疗皮肤利什曼病患者的疗效,并将其与最有效的标准治疗药物五价锑化合物进行比较。 设计:一项非随机、开放标签的对照临床试验。 研究地点及时间:2005年3月至10月在巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第军事医院皮肤科。 患者及方法:选择30例临床及组织病理学诊断为皮肤利什曼病、年龄在12岁及以上的患者。15例患者口服米替福新,剂量为2.5mg/kg/天,共28天;其余15例接受注射用五价锑,剂量为20mg/kg/天,共28天。所有病例均在治疗前进行全面体格检查及必要的实验室检查。治疗2周后及治疗结束时再次进行检查,以记录任何偏离正常范围的情况。两组在年龄、体重、寄生虫学评分方面基本匹配。通过治疗前、治疗2周和4周时的溃疡大小评估疗效。患者在3个月和6个月时进行随访。通过z检验计算p值,对两组疗效进行统计学比较。 结果:所有患者均完成研究,无任何严重并发症。病变明显改善,仅留下瘢痕和炎症后色素沉着。3个月时,A组治愈率为93%,B组为73.33%;6个月末,分别为86%和66.6%。两组疗效差异无统计学意义(p值>0.5)。 结论:米替福新似乎是目前所用疗法的一种安全有效的替代药物。米替福新的显著优势在于其口服给药方式,在寄生虫对现有药物耐药的地区可能也有帮助。

相似文献

[1]
Miltefosine in cutaneous leishmaniasis.

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007-3

[2]
Comparison of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) by a randomized clinical trial in Iran.

Acta Trop. 2007-7

[3]
Treatment of American cutaneous leishmaniasis with miltefosine, an oral agent.

Clin Infect Dis. 2001-10-1

[4]
A comparative study between the efficacy of systemic meglumine antimoniate therapy with standard or low dose plus oral omeprazole in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

J Vector Borne Dis. 2008-12

[5]
Oral miltefosine for Indian visceral leishmaniasis.

N Engl J Med. 2002-11-28

[6]
Efficacy of miltefosine for Bolivian cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008-2

[7]
Miltefosine for new world cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Clin Infect Dis. 2004-5-1

[8]
Allopurinol in the treatment of American cutaneous leishmaniasis.

N Engl J Med. 1992-3-12

[9]
Orally effective drugs for kala-azar (visceral leishmaniasis): focus on miltefosine and sitamaquine.

J Assoc Physicians India. 2003-7

[10]
Efficacy of local heat therapy by radiofrequency in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis, compared with intralesional injection of meglumine antimoniate.

Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Tolerability and Safety of Miltefosine for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024-9-19

[2]
Safety and efficacy of miltefosine in cutaneous leishmaniasis: An open label, non-comparative study from Balochistan.

Pak J Med Sci. 2019

[3]
Efficacy of miltefosine compared with glucantime for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Epidemiol Health. 2019-3-31

[4]
Case Report: Old World Mucosal Leishmaniasis: Report of Five Imported Cases to the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, United Kingdom.

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017-10

[5]
Miltefosine for Mucosal and Complicated Cutaneous Old World Leishmaniasis: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016-2-1

[6]
Leishmaniasis in the United States: treatment in 2012.

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012-3

[7]
Miltefosine efficiently eliminates Leishmania major amastigotes from infected murine dendritic cells without altering their immune functions.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009-12-7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索