Rahman Simeen Ber, ul Bari Arfan, Mumtaz Nadeem
Department of Dermatology, Military Hospital, Rawalpindi.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007 Mar;17(3):132-5.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of oral Miltefosine in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis and its comparison with the most effective standard treatment, pentavalent antimony compound. DESIGN: A non-randomized, open label comparative clinical trial. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Dermatology Department, Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan from March to October 2005. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients, 12 years of age or older clinically and histopathologically diagnosed as cutaneous leishmaniasis were selected. Fifteen patients received orally administered Miltefosine 2.5mg/kg/day for 28 days and remaining 15 received injectable pentavalent antimony 20mg/kg/day for 28 days. Pre-treatment complete physical examination was done along with necessary laboratory investigations in all cases. These were repeated again after 2 weeks and at the end of treatment to note any deviation from the normal limits. Groups were almost matched in terms of age, weight, parasitological score. The efficacy was evaluated by ulcer size, before therapy, at 2 weeks and 4 weeks. Patients were followed-up at 3 and 6 months. Efficacy of two groups was statistically compared by calculating p-value by z-test. RESULTS: All patients completed the study without any serious complication. Lesions improved significantly and only scarring and post-inflammatory pigmentation was left. At 3 months, cure rate was 93% in group A and it was 73.33% in group B while at the end of 6 months, it was 86% and 66.6% respectively. This difference between efficacies of two groups was not found to be statistically significant (p-value>0.5). CONCLUSION: Miltefosine appears to be a safe and effective alternative to currently used therapies. The striking advantage of Miltefosine is its oral administration and it may also be helpful in regions where parasites are resistant to current agents.
目的:确定口服米替福新治疗皮肤利什曼病患者的疗效,并将其与最有效的标准治疗药物五价锑化合物进行比较。 设计:一项非随机、开放标签的对照临床试验。 研究地点及时间:2005年3月至10月在巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第军事医院皮肤科。 患者及方法:选择30例临床及组织病理学诊断为皮肤利什曼病、年龄在12岁及以上的患者。15例患者口服米替福新,剂量为2.5mg/kg/天,共28天;其余15例接受注射用五价锑,剂量为20mg/kg/天,共28天。所有病例均在治疗前进行全面体格检查及必要的实验室检查。治疗2周后及治疗结束时再次进行检查,以记录任何偏离正常范围的情况。两组在年龄、体重、寄生虫学评分方面基本匹配。通过治疗前、治疗2周和4周时的溃疡大小评估疗效。患者在3个月和6个月时进行随访。通过z检验计算p值,对两组疗效进行统计学比较。 结果:所有患者均完成研究,无任何严重并发症。病变明显改善,仅留下瘢痕和炎症后色素沉着。3个月时,A组治愈率为93%,B组为73.33%;6个月末,分别为86%和66.6%。两组疗效差异无统计学意义(p值>0.5)。 结论:米替福新似乎是目前所用疗法的一种安全有效的替代药物。米替福新的显著优势在于其口服给药方式,在寄生虫对现有药物耐药的地区可能也有帮助。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007-3
Clin Infect Dis. 2001-10-1
N Engl J Med. 2002-11-28
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008-2
Clin Infect Dis. 2004-5-1
N Engl J Med. 1992-3-12
J Assoc Physicians India. 2003-7
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024-9-19
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016-2-1
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012-3
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009-12-7