Suppr超能文献

在伊朗进行的一项随机临床试验中,比较米替福新和葡甲胺锑酸盐治疗人兽共患皮肤利什曼病(ZCL)的效果。

Comparison of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) by a randomized clinical trial in Iran.

作者信息

Mohebali M, Fotouhi A, Hooshmand B, Zarei Z, Akhoundi B, Rahnema A, Razaghian A R, Kabir M J, Nadim A

机构信息

School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, Medical Sciences/University of Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6446, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Acta Trop. 2007 Jul;103(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 May 18.

Abstract

This study was a randomized, open label comparison that was designed to determine efficacy and safety of miltefosine as the first oral drug for the treatment of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major in comparison with meglumine antimoniate. Complete clinical response was defined as 100% re-epithelialization of the lesion. Definitions of lesion cure and failure were based on both clinical and parasitological criteria two weeks after the end of treatment and clinical recovery three months after this period. Of 32 patients enrolled for miltefosine treatment 28 patients completed treatment, of which 26 were cured at three months, corresponding to a cure rate of 92.9% on a per protocol analysis, and 81.3% according to intention to treat analysis. There was one failure (3.1%), one relapse (3.1%) and four dropouts due to lack of tolerability (12.5%) during the first week of treatment. Of 31 patients who received intramuscular meglumine antimoniate (20mgSb(5)/kg body weight daily for 14 days) 25 were cured (83.3% on a per protocol basis, 80.6% on intention to treat basis), five failed (16.1%) and one was lost (3.2%) at 3-month follow-up. At 6-month follow-up after the end of treatment, no relapse was observed. Both regimens were tolerated but averages of nausea (32.2%) and vomiting (21.5%) were observed in patients during two weeks after initiation of miltefosine treatment. Other gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and total adverse events were not statistically different in the two groups during one to four weeks after therapy initiation. No relevant changes were observed in levels of liver enzymes, creatinine and hematological tests before and after end of treatment in both groups. In conclusion, miltefosine is apparently at least as good as meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. major in Iran, based on parasitological as well as clinical criteria two weeks, three months, and six months after end of treatment.

摘要

本研究是一项随机、开放标签的对照试验,旨在确定米替福新作为治疗由硕大利什曼原虫引起的人兽共患皮肤利什曼病的首款口服药物,与葡甲胺锑酸盐相比的疗效和安全性。完全临床缓解定义为皮损100%重新上皮化。皮损治愈和失败的定义基于治疗结束后两周的临床和寄生虫学标准以及此后三个月的临床恢复情况。在纳入米替福新治疗的32例患者中,28例完成治疗,其中26例在三个月时治愈,按符合方案分析治愈率为92.9%,按意向性分析为81.3%。治疗第一周有1例治疗失败(3.1%)、1例复发(3.1%)以及4例因耐受性差退出(12.5%)。在31例接受肌肉注射葡甲胺锑酸盐(每日20mgSb(5)/kg体重,共14天)的患者中,25例治愈(按符合方案分析为83.3%,按意向性分析为80.6%),5例治疗失败(16.1%),1例在3个月随访时失访(3.2%)。在治疗结束后6个月随访时,未观察到复发情况。两种治疗方案耐受性均良好,但在开始米替福新治疗后的两周内,患者中观察到恶心(32.2%)和呕吐(21.5%)的平均发生率。在治疗开始后的1至4周内,两组的其他胃肠道、肌肉骨骼及总的不良事件在统计学上无差异。两组治疗结束前后,肝酶、肌酐水平及血液学检查均未观察到相关变化。总之,基于治疗结束后两周、三个月及六个月时的寄生虫学及临床标准,在伊朗治疗由硕大利什曼原虫引起的皮肤利什曼病方面,米替福新显然至少与葡甲胺锑酸盐一样有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验