Oyewole I O, Awolola T S, Ibidapo C A, Oduola A O, Okwa O O, Obansa J A
Babcock University, Ilisan Remo, Nigeria.
J Vector Borne Dis. 2007 Mar;44(1):56-64.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Anopheline mosquitoes consist of a large number of species each of which differs from another in population, resting and feeding behaviour in relation to the prevailing conditions in the locality. A longitudinal study was carried out to investigate the population dynamics, resting and feeding behaviour of the major anopheline species found in a rain forest zone of Nigeria.
Mosquitoes resting and biting indoors were collected using WHO standard techniques and supplemented with outdoor-biting collections in the study areas between January and December 2004. Samples were sorted and identified microscopically for morphological features while molecular identification was carried out using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques.
PCR-based tests showed that both indoor and outdoor collections constitute three groups of Anopheles mosquitoes, An. gambiae s.l. Giles (68.6%), An. funestus Giles (30.7%) and An. moucheti Evans (0.7%). Of the 1342 female Anopheles mosquitoes collected indoors, 799 were caught resting and 543 were caught biting. The outdoor-biting population accounted for 28.8% of the total collections (n=1885). There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the biting activities (indoors and outdoors) of these species in four villages. However, An. arabiensis and An. moucheti were more exophagic with >60% of their biting occurring outdoors while An. gambiae and An. funestus were more endophagic with >55% of their biting occurring indoors. The human-vector contact with An. gambiae and An. funestus (indoors) was about 73.3 and 66.7%, respectively as against 27.7% in An. arabiensis and 25.3% in An. moucheti. This gave the corresponding man-biting rates (MBR) of 17.5 bites/man/night for An. gambiae, 14.6 bites/man/night for An. funestus, 6.7 bites/man/night for An. arabiensis and 4.3 bites/man/night for An. moucheti. Moreover, the number of An. gambiae and An. funestus caught resting indoors was significantly higher than the other two species (p < 0.05). The wet season collections showed thatAn. gambiae caught were more than 67% of the total catch while An. arabiensis was predominant in the dry season (chi2 = 75.44, df = 3, p < 0.01).
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: The present study highlights some aspects of the behaviour of anopheline mosquitoes in southern Nigeria which is an important component of epidemiological study of malaria. This information provides basis to the understanding of the role played by the identified anopheline species in malaria transmission and a baseline to formulate malaria control programme.
按蚊种类繁多,每种按蚊在数量、栖息和取食行为方面因当地环境条件而异。开展了一项纵向研究,以调查尼日利亚雨林地区主要按蚊种类的种群动态、栖息和取食行为。
2004年1月至12月期间,在研究区域使用世界卫生组织标准技术收集室内栖息和叮咬的蚊子,并补充室外叮咬采集。样本通过显微镜检查形态特征进行分类和鉴定,同时使用聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术进行分子鉴定。
基于PCR的检测表明,室内和室外采集的按蚊分为三组,即冈比亚按蚊复合组(Giles,68.6%)、嗜人按蚊(Giles,30.7%)和穆氏按蚊(Evans,0.7%)。在室内收集的1342只雌性按蚊中,799只被捕获时处于栖息状态,543只被捕获时正在叮咬。室外叮咬的种群占总采集量的28.8%(n = 1885)。这四个村庄中这些种类的蚊子在室内和室外的叮咬活动没有显著差异(p > 0.05)。然而,阿拉伯按蚊和穆氏按蚊更倾向于外嗜性,超过60%的叮咬发生在室外,而冈比亚按蚊和嗜人按蚊更倾向于内嗜性,超过55%的叮咬发生在室内。人类与冈比亚按蚊和嗜人按蚊(室内)的接触率分别约为73.3%和66.7%,而与阿拉伯按蚊的接触率为27.7%,与穆氏按蚊的接触率为25.3%。这使得冈比亚按蚊的人均叮咬率(MBR)为17.5次/人/夜,嗜人按蚊为14.6次/人/夜,阿拉伯按蚊为6.7次/人/夜,穆氏按蚊为4.3次/人/夜。此外,在室内捕获的处于栖息状态的冈比亚按蚊和嗜人按蚊数量显著高于其他两个种类(p < 0.05)。雨季采集显示,捕获的冈比亚按蚊占总捕获量的67%以上,而阿拉伯按蚊在旱季占主导地位(χ² = 75.44,自由度 = 3,p < 0.01)。
本研究突出了尼日利亚南部按蚊行为的一些方面,这是疟疾流行病学研究的重要组成部分。这些信息为理解已鉴定的按蚊种类在疟疾传播中所起的作用提供了依据,并为制定疟疾控制计划提供了基线。