Suppr超能文献

利益相关者对提供非预约医疗服务新方式的看法:所有权和组织身份的作用。

Stakeholder perspectives on new ways of delivering unscheduled health care: the role of ownership and organizational identity.

作者信息

Haddow Gill, O'Donnell Catherine A, Heaney David

机构信息

Community Health Sciences - General Practice, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Apr;13(2):179-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00667.x.

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore stakeholder perspectives of the implementation of a new, national integrated nurse-led telephone advice and consultation service [National Health Service 24 (NHS 24)], comparing the views of stakeholders from different health care organizations.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with 26 stakeholders including partner organizations located in primary and secondary unscheduled care settings [general practitioner (GP) out-of-hours cooperative; accident and emergency department; national ambulance service, members of NHS 24 and national policy makers. Attendance at key meetings, documentary review and email implementation diaries provided a contextual history of events with which interview data could be compared.

RESULTS

The contextual history of events highlighted a fast-paced implementation process, with little time for reflection. Key areas of partner concern were increasing workload, the clinical safety of nurse triage and the lack of communication across the organizations. Concerns were most apparent within the GP out-of-hours cooperative, leading to calls for the dissolution of the partnership. Accident and emergency and ambulance service responses were more conciliatory, suggesting that such problems were to be expected within the developmental phase of a new organization. Further exploration of these responses highlighted the sense of ownership within the GP cooperative, with GPs having both financial and philosophical ownership of the cooperative. This was not apparent within the other two partner organizations, in particular the ambulance service, which operated on a regional model very similar to that of NHS 24.

CONCLUSIONS

As the delivery of unscheduled primary health care crosses professional boundaries and locations, different organizations and professional groups must develop new ways of partnership working, developing trust and confidence in each other. The results of this study highlight, for the first time, the key importance of understanding the professional ownership and identity of individual organizations, in order to facilitate the most effective mechanisms to enable that partnership working.

摘要

基本原理、目的和目标:探讨利益相关者对一项新的全国性由护士主导的综合电话咨询服务(国民保健服务24小时热线,即NHS 24)实施情况的看法,比较来自不同医疗保健组织的利益相关者的观点。

方法

对26名利益相关者进行半结构化访谈,这些利益相关者包括位于初级和二级非预约护理环境中的合作组织[全科医生(GP)非工作时间合作机构;急诊科;国家救护服务机构、NHS 24的成员以及国家政策制定者。参加关键会议、文件审查和电子邮件实施日记提供了事件的背景历史,可与访谈数据进行比较。

结果

事件的背景历史突出了一个快节奏的实施过程,几乎没有时间进行反思。合作伙伴关注的关键领域包括工作量增加、护士分诊的临床安全性以及各组织之间缺乏沟通。这些担忧在GP非工作时间合作机构中最为明显,导致有人呼吁解散该合作关系。急诊科和救护服务机构的反应更为缓和,表明在新组织的发展阶段出现此类问题是可以预料的。对这些反应的进一步探究突出了GP合作机构中的主人翁意识,全科医生在经济和理念上都对合作机构拥有所有权。在其他两个合作伙伴组织中,尤其是救护服务机构,这种情况并不明显,救护服务机构采用的区域模式与NHS 24非常相似。

结论

由于非预约初级卫生保健的提供跨越了专业界限和地点,不同的组织和专业团体必须开发新的合作工作方式,并相互建立信任。本研究结果首次强调了理解各个组织的专业所有权和身份的关键重要性,以便促进实现这种合作工作的最有效机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验