Breen Stephen L, Publicover Julia, De Silva Shiroma, Pond Greg, Brock Kristy, O'Sullivan Brian, Cummings Bernard, Dawson Laura, Keller Anne, Kim John, Ringash Jolie, Yu Eugene, Hendler Aaron, Waldron John
Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 1;68(3):763-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.039. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
To determine if the addition of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) data changes primary site gross tumor volumes (GTVs) in head and neck cancers.
Computed tomography (CT), contrast-enhanced CT, and FDG-PET-CT scans were obtained in 10 patients with head and neck cancers. Eight experienced observers (6 head and neck oncologists and 2 neuro-radiologists) with access to clinical and radiologic reports outlined primary site GTVs on each modality. Three cases were recontoured twice to assess intraobserver variability. The magnitudes of the GTVs were compared. Intra- and interobserver variability was assessed by a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were calculated.
There were no significant differences in the GTVs across the image modalities when compared as ensemble averages; the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test showed that CT volumes were larger than PET-CT. Observers demonstrated the greatest consistency and were most interchangeable on contrast-enhanced CT; they performed less reliably on PET-CT.
The addition of PET-CT to primary site GTV delineation of head and neck cancers does not change the volume of the GTV defined by this group of expert observers in this patient sample. An FDG-PET may demonstrate differences in neck node delineation and in other disease sites.
确定添加氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)数据是否会改变头颈癌原发部位的大体肿瘤体积(GTV)。
对10名头颈癌患者进行了计算机断层扫描(CT)、增强CT和FDG-PET-CT扫描。8名经验丰富的观察者(6名头颈肿瘤学家和2名神经放射科医生)在获取临床和放射学报告后,在每种检查方式上勾勒出原发部位的GTV。对3例病例进行了两次重新勾勒,以评估观察者内的变异性。比较了GTV的大小。通过双向重复测量方差分析评估观察者内和观察者间的变异性。计算了观察者间和观察者内的可靠性。
作为总体平均值进行比较时,各图像检查方式的GTV之间无显著差异;Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验显示CT体积大于PET-CT。观察者在增强CT上表现出最大的一致性且最具互换性;他们在PET-CT上的表现可靠性较低。
对头颈癌原发部位GTV的勾画添加PET-CT,并不会改变该患者样本中这群专家观察者所定义的GTV体积。FDG-PET可能在颈部淋巴结勾画及其他疾病部位显示出差异。