Vega-López Sonia, Ausman Lynne M, Griffith John L, Lichtenstein Alice H
Cardiovascular Nutrition Laboratory, Jean Mayer U.S. Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2007 Jun;30(6):1412-7. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1598. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
We sought to assess the intra- and interindividual variability of glycemic index value determinations for white bread using glucose as the reference food.
A total of 23 healthy adults (aged 20-70 years) completed up to three sets of two visits per set. Each pair of visits assessed the glycemic response to 50 g available carbohydrates from commercial white bread and glucose, administered in random order. Glycemic index values were calculated by dividing the 2-h incremental area under the serum glucose response curve after each commercial white bread challenge by the mean area under the curve (AUC) for glucose.
The mean +/- SE ratio of the AUC after white bread intake by the AUC after glucose intake for the first set of determinations was 78 +/- 15 (n = 23; coefficient of variation [CV] 94%). When using glycemic index values calculated with the subset of participants who completed three sets of tests (n = 14), glycemic index values for each of the three sets of determinations were 78 +/- 10, 60 +/- 5, and 75 +/- 10, respectively. CVs were 50, 28, and 50%, respectively. The mean glycemic index value of these three sets was 71 +/- 6, with a CV of 30%. When an ANOVA approach was applied to these data, the interindividual CV was 17.8%, and the intra-individual variation was 42.8%.
These data suggest that in response to a challenge of white bread relative to glucose, within-individual variability is a greater contributor to overall variability than among-individual variability. Further understanding of all the sources of variability would be helpful in better defining the utility of glycemic index values.
我们试图以葡萄糖作为参考食物,评估白面包血糖指数值测定的个体内和个体间变异性。
共有23名健康成年人(年龄20 - 70岁)完成了多达三组,每组两次的测试。每对测试以随机顺序评估对来自市售白面包和葡萄糖的50克可利用碳水化合物的血糖反应。血糖指数值通过将每次市售白面包激发后血清葡萄糖反应曲线下的2小时增量面积除以葡萄糖曲线下的平均面积(AUC)来计算。
在第一组测定中,白面包摄入后AUC与葡萄糖摄入后AUC的平均±SE比值为78±15(n = 23;变异系数[CV]94%)。当使用完成三组测试的参与者子集(n = 14)计算的血糖指数值时,三组测定中每组的血糖指数值分别为78±10、60±5和75±10。CV分别为50%、28%和50%。这三组的平均血糖指数值为71±6,CV为30%。当对这些数据应用方差分析方法时,个体间CV为17.8%,个体内变异为42.8%。
这些数据表明,相对于葡萄糖,在应对白面包激发时,个体内变异性对总体变异性的贡献大于个体间变异性。进一步了解变异性的所有来源将有助于更好地确定血糖指数值的效用。