Healthy Lifestyles Research Center, School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, 500 North 3rd Street, Phoenix AZ 85004, USA.
Br J Nutr. 2013 Nov;110(10):1782-8. doi: 10.1017/S000711451300130X. Epub 2013 May 9.
Prior studies assessing the metabolic effects of different types of carbohydrates have focused on their glycaemic response. However, the response of postprandial cardiometabolic risk indicators has not been considered in these studies. The present study assessed postprandial lipid responses to two forms of carbohydrates used as reference foods for glycaemic index determinations, white bread (50 g available carbohydrate) and glucose (50 g), under controlled conditions and with intra-individual replicate determinations. A total of twenty adults (20–70 years) underwent two cycles of challenges with each pair of reference foods (four challenges/person), administered in a random order on separate days under standard conditions. Serum lipids (total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, TAG and NEFA), glucose and insulin were monitored for 5 h post-ingestion. Oral glucose resulted in greater glycaemic and insulinaemic responses than white bread for the first 90 min and a greater subsequent decline after 120 min (P =0·0001). The initial decline in serum NEFA concentrations was greater after the oral glucose than after the white bread challenge, as was the rebound after 150 min (P = 0·001). Nevertheless, the type of carbohydrate had no significant effect on postprandial total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol concentrations. Following an initial modest rise in TAG concentrations in response to both challenges, the values dropped below the fasting values for oral glucose but not for the white bread challenge. These data suggest that the type of carbohydrate used to determine the glycaemic index, bread or glucose, has little or modest effects on postprandial plasma cholesterol concentrations. Differences in TAG and NEFA concentrations over the 5 h time period were modest, and their clinical relevance is unclear.
先前评估不同类型碳水化合物代谢效应的研究主要关注其血糖反应。然而,这些研究并未考虑餐后心血管代谢风险指标的反应。本研究在受控条件下,对两种用作血糖指数测定参考食物的碳水化合物(白面包(50 克可利用碳水化合物)和葡萄糖(50 克))进行了餐后脂质反应评估,并采用个体内重复测定。共有 20 名成年人(20-70 岁)在标准条件下,分两天随机进行了每对参考食物(每人 4 次挑战)的两轮挑战。在摄入后 5 小时监测血清脂质(总胆固醇、LDL-胆固醇、HDL-胆固醇、TAG 和 NEFA)、血糖和胰岛素。与白面包相比,口服葡萄糖在前 90 分钟引起更大的血糖和胰岛素反应,在 120 分钟后引起更大的后续下降(P=0.0001)。口服葡萄糖后血清 NEFA 浓度的初始下降大于白面包挑战后的下降,150 分钟后反弹也是如此(P=0.001)。然而,碳水化合物的类型对餐后总胆固醇、LDL-胆固醇和 HDL-胆固醇浓度没有显著影响。在两种挑战下,TAG 浓度最初适度升高后,数值下降到低于空腹值,但口服葡萄糖的数值下降,而白面包的数值则没有。这些数据表明,用于确定血糖指数的碳水化合物类型(面包或葡萄糖)对餐后血浆胆固醇浓度的影响很小或适度。在 5 小时的时间内,TAG 和 NEFA 浓度的差异较小,其临床意义尚不清楚。