Segers Patrick, Rietzschel Ernst R, De Buyzere Marc L, Vermeersch Sebastian J, De Bacquer Dirk, Van Bortel Luc M, De Backer Guy, Gillebert Thierry C, Verdonck Pascal R
Cardiovascular Mechanics and Biofluid Dynamics, IBiTech, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.
Hypertension. 2007 Jun;49(6):1248-55. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.106.085480. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
The relation between arterial function indices, such as pulse wave velocity and augmentation index with parameters derived from input impedance analysis, is still incompletely understood. Carotid pressure, central flow waveforms, and pulse wave velocity were noninvasively acquired in 2026 apparently healthy, middle-aged subjects (1052 women and 974 men) 35 to 55 years old at inclusion. Input and characteristic impedance, reflection coefficient, the ratio of backward-to-forward pressure amplitude (reflection magnitude), and augmentation index were derived. Pulse wave velocity increased by 15% (from 6.1 to 7.0 m/s) both in men and women. In qualitative terms, input impedance evolved from a pattern indicative of wave transmission and reflection to a pattern more compatible with a windkessel-like system. In women, a decrease in total arterial compliance led to an increased input impedance in the low frequency range, whereas few changes were observed in men. Characteristic impedance did not change with age in women and even decreased in men (P<0.001) and could not be identified as the primary determinant of central pulse pressure. Augmentation index increased with age, as was expected, and was systematically higher in women (P<0.001). Reflection coefficient and reflection magnitude increased with age (P<0.001) without gender differences. We conclude that, in healthy middle-aged subjects, the age-related increase in arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity) is not fully paralleled by an increase in arterial impedance, suggesting a role for age-dependent modulation of aortic cross-sectional area. Wave reflection increases with age and is not higher in women than in men.
诸如脉搏波速度和增强指数等动脉功能指标与输入阻抗分析得出的参数之间的关系仍未完全明了。在纳入研究的2026名35至55岁表面健康的中年受试者(1052名女性和974名男性)中,无创获取了颈动脉压力、中心血流波形和脉搏波速度。得出了输入阻抗和特性阻抗、反射系数、后向与前向压力幅度之比(反射幅度)以及增强指数。男性和女性的脉搏波速度均增加了15%(从6.1米/秒增至7.0米/秒)。定性而言,输入阻抗从一种表明波传播和反射的模式演变为一种更符合风箱样系统的模式。在女性中,总动脉顺应性降低导致低频范围内的输入阻抗增加,而在男性中观察到的变化较少。特性阻抗在女性中不随年龄变化,在男性中甚至降低(P<0.001),且不能被确定为中心脉压的主要决定因素。正如预期的那样,增强指数随年龄增加,且在女性中系统性地更高(P<0.001)。反射系数和反射幅度随年龄增加(P<0.001),无性别差异。我们得出结论,在健康中年受试者中,与年龄相关的动脉僵硬度增加(脉搏波速度)并未完全与动脉阻抗增加并行,这表明主动脉横截面积的年龄依赖性调节起了作用。波反射随年龄增加,女性并不高于男性。